The impact of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant timing and psychosocial factors on family and caregiver adjustment

被引:6
|
作者
Chardon, Marie L. [1 ]
Canter, Kimberly S. [2 ,3 ]
Pai, Ahna L. H. [1 ,4 ]
Peugh, James L. [1 ,4 ]
Madan-Swain, Avi [5 ]
Vega, Gabriela [2 ]
Joffe, Naomi E. [1 ,4 ]
Kazak, Anne E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, 3333 Burnet Ave,MLC 7039, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Nemours Childrens Hlth Syst, Nemours Ctr Healthcare Delivery Sci, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Pediat Hematol & Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
family adjustment; hematology; oncology; pediatric; stem cell transplantation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARENTS; CHILDREN; SURVIVORS; DISTRESS; SIBLINGS; PATTERNS; MOTHERS; SCALE; SCT;
D O I
10.1002/pbc.28552
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The impact of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) on family functioning varies, but little is known about how the timing of HCT in children's treatment course contributes to this variability. This study examines how preexisting child, sibling, and family problems, the length of time between diagnosis to HCT, and children's age at HCT are associated with family and caregiver functioning. Procedure Caregivers (n = 140) of children (<= 18 years old) scheduled to undergo their first HCT completed the Psychological Assessment Tool-HCT and the Impact on Family Scale. Treatment information was extracted from electronic medical records. A bootstrapped multivariate path analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Results More preexisting family problems related to greater caregiver perceived negative impact of their child's HCT across family and caregiver functioning domains. Less time between diagnosis and HCT was associated with greater caregiver personal strain, particularly for those with younger children undergoing HCT. Younger child age at HCT was also associated with a larger negative impact on family social functioning. Conclusions Families with preexisting problems are the most at-risk for experiencing negative impacts related to their child's HCT. The timing of a child's HCT within their treatment course and the child's age during HCT may impact families' social functioning and caregiver adjustment. Screening families for preexisting family problems, particularly for families with young children or who are abruptly learning of their child's need for an HCT, may assist providers in identifying families who would benefit from earlier or more intensive psychosocial support.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family Adjustment to Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant During COVID-19
    Chardon, Marie L.
    Klages, Kimberly L.
    Joffe, Naomi E.
    Pai, Ahna L. H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 46 (10) : 1172 - 1181
  • [2] Caregiver self-efficacy providing nutritional support for pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant is associated with psychosocial factors
    LaLonde, Leah
    Neenan, Alexandra
    Byrd, Michelle
    Hoodin, Flora
    Bouma, Sandra
    Choi, Sung Won
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [3] Caregiver Perspectives on Psychosocial Care in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)
    Kazak, Anne E.
    Swain, Avi Madan
    Pai, Ahna L. H.
    Canter, Kimberly
    Carlson, Olivia
    Vega, Gabriela
    Joffe, Naomi
    Deatrick, Janet
    CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 8 (01) : 67 - 78
  • [4] Caregiver Religious Coping and Posttraumatic Responses in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
    Chardon, Marie L.
    Brammer, Caitlin
    Madan-Swain, Avi
    Kazak, Anne E.
    Pai, Ahna L. H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 465 - 473
  • [5] The Family Transition Through Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
    West, Christina
    Dusome, Debra
    Rallison, Lillian
    Winsor, Joanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2017, 16 (01):
  • [6] CARING FOR THE CAREGIVER: EHEALTH INTERVENTIONS FOR PARENTS OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Parsons, Susan K.
    Ratichek, Sara J.
    Rodday, Angie M.
    Davies, Stella
    Bingen, Kristin
    Kupst, Mary Jo
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Guinan, Eva C.
    Syrjala, Karen L.
    Patel, Sunita
    Mayer, Deborah K.
    McTavish, Fiona
    Gustafson, David H.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2011, 56 (07) : 1159 - 1159
  • [7] Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
    Fraint, Ellen
    Holuba, Mary Jo
    Wray, Lisa
    PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2020, 41 (11) : 609 - 611
  • [8] Screening for Family Psychosocial Risk in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool
    Pai, Ahna L. H.
    Swain, Avi Madan
    Chen, Fang Fang
    Hwang, Wei-Ting
    Vega, Gabriela
    Carlson, Olivia
    Ortiz, Francisco Argueta
    Canter, Kimberly
    Joffe, Naomi
    Kolb, E. Anders
    Davies, Stella M.
    Chewning, Joseph H.
    Deatrick, Janet
    Kazak, Anne E.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (07) : 1374 - 1381
  • [9] Factors Associated With Parental Activation in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
    Pennarola, Brian W.
    Rodday, Angie Mae
    Mayer, Deborah K.
    Ratichek, Sara J.
    Davies, Stella M.
    Syrjala, Karen L.
    Patel, Sunita
    Bingen, Kristin
    Kupst, Mary Jo
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Guinan, Eva C.
    Hibbard, Judith H.
    Parsons, Susan K.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2012, 69 (02) : 194 - 214
  • [10] Transplant center practices for psychosocial assessment and management of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell donors
    Lori Wiener
    Jennifer A. Hoag
    Wendy Pelletier
    Nirali N. Shah
    Bronwen E. Shaw
    Michael A. Pulsipher
    Jessica Bruce
    Peter Bader
    Andre M. Willasch
    Arnaud Dalissier
    Gregory Guilcher
    Chloe Anthias
    Dennis L. Confer
    Jennifer A. Sees
    Brent Logan
    Galen E. Switzer
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2019, 54 : 1780 - 1788