Occam's Razor dictates that the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions in explaining the results is preferred. In a recent paper by Kiniry et al, (Field Crops Res. 56, 265-270, 1998), Occam's Razor was overlooked in favor of a hypothetical relationship of decreasing radiation use efficiency (RUE) with increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Their conclusion is challenged for three reasons. Firstly, there is virtually no background information that supports such a relationship. Secondly, no rigorous test of the data of Kiniry et al. was presented to confirm such a conclusion over the hypothesis that RUE was not sensitive to VPD. Thirdly, there are concerns in the methods used to experimentally estimate VPD and RUE. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.