The acceptability of emergency cervical cerclage within a randomised controlled trial for cervical dilatation with exposed membranes at 16-27+6 weeks gestation: Findings from a qualitative process evaluation of the C-STICH2 pilot trial

被引:2
|
作者
Molloy, Eleanor [1 ]
Pilarski, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Morris, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Murray Learning Ctr, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Birmingham Womens & Childrens Hosp, Birmingham B15 2TG, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Randomised Controlled Trials; Emergency cervical cerclage; Pre-term Birth; High-risk pregnancy; Qualitative process evaluation; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PREGNANT-WOMEN; RECRUITMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: C-STICH2 is a randomised controlled trial of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) vs routine care in women who present in pregnancy with premature cervical dilatation and exposed unruptured fetal membranes. Within the proposed trial an internal pilot was performed with an embedded qualitative process evaluation (QPE) to explore the feasibility of recruitment. The QPE aimed to collect and analyse data exploring the expe-riences of health care professionals (HCPs) involved in recruitment, and women approached about the trial.Methods: Semi-structured interviews (telephone or face-to-face) were held with eligible participants who had consented to participate in the QPE. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed to identify main themes. Interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis (QTA).Results: 11 women and 23 HCPs were interviewed. Three super-ordinate themes of Fluidity of Equipoise, A Complex Obstetric History, and the Influence of Gestation were identified. Within these, the five main themes which influenced trial participation were: 1) Complex decision-making processes; 2) Predicting outcomes; 3) The importance of terminology and initial RCT approach; 4) Women's understanding of the need for research in this area; 5) Changes in practice which are trial influenced.Conclusions: For both HCPs and women and their families, there was a conflation of the potential risks and outcomes of ECC with those of elective cerclage and the complexity around ECC placement was not always well understood by those with less experience and understanding of the intervention. Decision making was shown to be complex and multi-factorial for both HCPs and women. For complex trials in rare conditions with treatment uncertainty, clinical equipoise is likely to be fluid and influenced by multiple factors.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 39
页数:13
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] C-STICH2: emergency cervical cerclage to prevent miscarriage and preterm birth—study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Victoria Hodgetts-Morton
    Catherine A. Hewitt
    Laura Jones
    Lisa Leighton
    Nicole Pilarski
    Eleanor Molloy
    Kim Hinshaw
    Jane Norman
    Jason Waugh
    Sarah Stock
    Jim Thornton
    Philip Toozs-Hobson
    Tracey Johnston
    Arri Coomarasamy
    Shakila Thangaratinam
    Ben Mol
    Eva Pajkrt
    Neil Marlow
    Tracy Roberts
    Lee Middleton
    Peter Brocklehurst
    Katie Morris
    Trials, 22
  • [2] C-STICH2: emergency cervical cerclage to prevent miscarriage and preterm birth-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria
    Hewitt, Catherine A.
    Jones, Laura
    Leighton, Lisa
    Pilarski, Nicole
    Molloy, Eleanor
    Hinshaw, Kim
    Norman, Jane
    Waugh, Jason
    Stock, Sarah
    Thornton, Jim
    Toozs-Hobson, Philip
    Johnston, Tracey
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Mol, Ben
    Pajkrt, Eva
    Marlow, Neil
    Roberts, Tracy
    Middleton, Lee
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Morris, Katie
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)