Keep Additive or Not: Do Moderating Effects Exist in Price-Mueller Turnover Model?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang Mian [1 ]
Wei Jun [2 ]
Li Hai [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Business Adm & Econ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
turnover; job satisfaction; organizational commitment; moderating effect;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Price-Mueller turnover model posits that values moderate the relationship between structural variables and two outcome variables, i.e. job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Using a sample collected from Chinese companies, the study reported in this paper explored the moderating effects. The results suggest that the relationship between structural variables and the two outcomes should not keep additive. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:7181 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] The Effect of Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support on Turnover Intention among Nurses: A Meta-Analysis Based on the Price-Mueller Model
    Zhu, Li-Li
    Wang, Hui-Juan
    Xu, Ya-Fei
    Ma, Shu-Ting
    Luo, Yan-Yan
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 2023
  • [2] Negative price-image effects of appealing store architecture: Do they really exist?
    Zielke, Stephan
    Toporowski, Waldemar
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2012, 19 (05) : 510 - 518
  • [3] A Conceptual Model of Customer Satisfaction: Moderating Effects of Price Sensitivity and Quality Seekers in the Airline Industry
    Khudhair, Harith Yas
    Jusoha, Ahmad
    Mardania, Abbas
    Nora, Khalil Md
    Streimikieneb, Dalia
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2019, 13 (03) : 283 - 291
  • [4] Do firms with more alliance experience outperform others with less? A three-level sigmoid model and the moderating effects of diversification
    Tseng, Chiung-Hui
    Chen, Shih-Fen S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 34 (03): : 229 - 243