Alcohol and drug treatment outcome studies: new methodological review (2005-2010) and comparison with past reviews

被引:8
|
作者
Robinson, Sean M. [1 ]
Sobell, Linda Carter [1 ]
Sobell, Mark B. [1 ]
Arcidiacono, Steven [1 ]
Tzall, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
Alcohol; Drug; Treatment outcome studies; Methodological review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTERVENTION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; DISORDERS; VALIDITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.029
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Several methodological reviews of alcohol treatment outcome studies and one review of drug studies have been published over the past 40 years. Although past reviews demonstrated methodological improvements in alcohol studies, they also found continued deficiencies. The current review allows for an updated evaluation of the methodological rigor of alcohol and drug studies and, by utilizing inclusion criteria similar to previous reviews, it allows for a comparative review overtime. In addition, this is the first review that compares the methodology of alcohol and drug treatment outcome studies published during the same time period. Method: The methodology for 25 alcohol and 11 drug treatment outcome studies published from 2005 through 2010 that met the review's inclusion criteria was evaluated. The majority of variables evaluated were used in prior reviews. Results: The current review found that more alcohol and drug treatment outcome studies are now using continuous substance use measures and assessing problem severity. Although there have been methodological improvements over time, the current reviews differed little from their most recent past counterpart. Despite this finding, some areas, particularly the continued low reporting of demographic data, needs strengthening. Conclusions: Improvement in the methodological rigor of alcohol and drug treatment outcome studies has occurred over time. The current review found few differences between alcohol and drug study methodologies as well as few differences between the current review and the most recent past alcohol and drug reviews. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] A Review of Intervention Studies On Technology-assisted Instruction From 2005-2010
    Wu, Ying-Tien
    Hou, Huei-Tse
    Hwang, Fu-Kwun
    Lee, Min-Hsien
    Lai, Chih-Hung
    Chiou, Guo-Li
    Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu
    Hsu, Yu-Chen
    Liang, Jyh-Chong
    Chen, Nian-Shing
    Tsai, Chin-Chung
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2013, 16 (03): : 191 - 203
  • [2] Carcinoid tumour characteristics, treatment and outcome: results from the National Lung Cancer Audit 2005-2010
    Musial, N.
    Stanley, R.
    Beckett, P.
    Peake, M.
    Woolhouse, I.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2012, 75 : S39 - S40
  • [4] DRUG AND ALCOHOL EDUCATION-PROGRAMS - A REVIEW OF OUTCOME STUDIES
    KINDER, BN
    PAPE, NE
    WALFISH, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1980, 15 (07): : 1035 - 1054
  • [5] PREVALENCE OF AND RISK FACTORS FOR HEPATITIS C IN INJECTION DRUG USERS (IDUS) 2005-2010 IN COMPARISON WITH 1991-1996
    Nseir, W.
    Gali, M.
    Abu Mouch, S.
    Djibre, A.
    Nassar, F.
    Assy, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 54 : S450 - S450
  • [6] Methodological overview and research design for adolescents in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Studies
    Kristiansen, PL
    Hubbard, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (06) : 545 - 562
  • [7] Risk Factors for Acquisition of Drug Resistance during Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia, 2005-2010
    Smith, Sarah E.
    Ershova, Julia
    Vlasova, Natalia
    Nikishova, Elena
    Tarasova, Irina
    Eliseev, Platon
    Maryandyshev, Andrey O.
    Shemyakin, Igor G.
    Kurbatova, Ekaterina
    Cegielski, J. Peter
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 21 (06) : 1002 - 1011
  • [8] Methodological characteristics and quality of alcohol treatment outcome studies, 1970-98: an expanded evaluation
    Moyer, A
    Finney, JW
    Swearingen, CE
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [9] A need for comparability in review design:: Comment on three reviews of studies for alcohol use disorder treatment
    Bühringer, G
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (03) : 295 - 296
  • [10] Development of a Routine Outcome Monitoring Instrument for Use with Clients in the New Zealand Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Sector: the Alcohol and Drug Outcome Measure (ADOM)
    Pulford, Justin
    Deering, Daryle E.
    Robinson, Gail
    Wheeler, Amanda
    Adamson, Simon J.
    Frampton, Christopher M. A.
    Dunbar, Lucy
    Paton-Simpson, Grant
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) : 35 - 45