The Effects of Sampling Bias and Model Complexity on the Predictive Performance of MaxEnt Species Distribution Models

被引:499
|
作者
Syfert, Mindy M. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Matthew J. [2 ]
Coomes, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Plant Sci, Forest Ecol & Conservat Grp, Cambridge, England
[2] Microsoft Res, Sci Computat Lab, Computat Ecol & Environm Sci Grp, Cambridge, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
PSEUDO-ABSENCES; TREE FERNS; CLIMATE; CONSERVATION; SIZE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; INFORMATION; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0055158
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) trained on presence-only data are frequently used in ecological research and conservation planning. However, users of SDM software are faced with a variety of options, and it is not always obvious how selecting one option over another will affect model performance. Working with MaxEnt software and with tree fern presence data from New Zealand, we assessed whether (a) choosing to correct for geographical sampling bias and (b) using complex environmental response curves have strong effects on goodness of fit. SDMs were trained on tree fern data, obtained from an online biodiversity data portal, with two sources that differed in size and geographical sampling bias: a small, widely-distributed set of herbarium specimens and a large, spatially clustered set of ecological survey records. We attempted to correct for geographical sampling bias by incorporating sampling bias grids in the SDMs, created from all georeferenced vascular plants in the datasets, and explored model complexity issues by fitting a wide variety of environmental response curves (known as "feature types" in MaxEnt). In each case, goodness of fit was assessed by comparing predicted range maps with tree fern presences and absences using an independent national dataset to validate the SDMs. We found that correcting for geographical sampling bias led to major improvements in goodness of fit, but did not entirely resolve the problem: predictions made with clustered ecological data were inferior to those made with the herbarium dataset, even after sampling bias correction. We also found that the choice of feature type had negligible effects on predictive performance, indicating that simple feature types may be sufficient once sampling bias is accounted for. Our study emphasizes the importance of reducing geographical sampling bias, where possible, in datasets used to train SDMs, and the effectiveness and essentialness of sampling bias correction within MaxEnt.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models
    Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie
    Niedballa, Juergen
    Pilgrim, John D.
    Schroeder, Boris
    Lindenborn, Jana
    Reinfelder, Vanessa
    Stillfried, Milena
    Heckmann, Ilja
    Scharf, Anne K.
    Augeri, Dave M.
    Cheyne, Susan M.
    Hearn, Andrew J.
    Ross, Joanna
    Macdonald, David W.
    Mathai, John
    Eaton, James
    Marshall, Andrew J.
    Semiadi, Gono
    Rustam, Rustam
    Bernard, Henry
    Alfred, Raymond
    Samejima, Hiromitsu
    Duckworth, J. W.
    Breitenmoser-Wuersten, Christine
    Belant, Jerrold L.
    Hofer, Heribert
    Wilting, Andreas
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (11) : 1366 - 1379
  • [2] From individual to joint species distribution models: A comparison of model complexity and predictive performance
    Caradima, Bogdan
    Schuwirth, Nele
    Reichert, Peter
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2019, 46 (10) : 2260 - 2274
  • [3] Evaluating sampling bias correction methods for invasive species distribution modeling in Maxent
    Sorbe, Frederic
    Graenzig, Tobias
    Foerster, Michael
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 76
  • [4] Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent
    Anderson, Robert P.
    Gonzalez, Israel, Jr.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (15) : 2796 - 2811
  • [5] Sampling bias in geographic and environmental space and its effect on the predictive power of species distribution models
    Bystriakova, Nadia
    Peregrym, Mykyta
    Erkens, Roy H. J.
    Bezsmertna, Olesya
    Schneider, Harald
    SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY, 2012, 10 (03) : 305 - 315
  • [6] Integrating uncertain prior knowledge regarding ecological preferences into multi-species distribution models: Effects of model complexity on predictive performance
    Vermeiren, Peter
    Reichert, Peter
    Schuwirth, Nele
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 420
  • [7] Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data
    Moreno-Amat, Elena
    Mateo, Ruben G.
    Nieto-Lugilde, Diego
    Morueta-Holme, Naia
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    Garcia-Amorena, Ignacio
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 312 : 308 - 317
  • [8] Effects of models and spatial resolutions on the species distribution model performance
    Farashi A.
    Alizadeh-Noughani M.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 4 (1) : 263 - 268
  • [9] Effects of species prevalence on the performance of predictive models
    Sor, Ratha
    Park, Young-Seuk
    Boets, Pieter
    Goethals, Peter L. M.
    Lek, Sovan
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 354 : 11 - 19
  • [10] The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models
    Duan, Ren-Yan
    Kong, Xiao-Quan
    Huang, Min-Yi
    Fan, Wei-Yi
    Wang, Zhi-Gao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):