Characterization of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters for application in clinical mammography

被引:9
|
作者
Benevides, LA
Hintenlang, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Nucl Sci Ctr 202, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[2] USN, Dosimetry Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2150779
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Five high-sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters in the TN-502 and 1002 series (Thomson Nielsen Electronics Ltd., 25B, Northside Road, Ottawa, ON K2H8S1, Canada) were evaluated for use in the mammography x-ray energy range (22-50 kVp) as a tool to assist in the documentation of patient specific average glandular dose. The dosimeters were interfaced with the Patient Dose Verification System, model No. TN-RD 15, which consisted of a dosimeter reader and up to four dual bias power supplies. Two different dual bias power supplies were evaluated in this study, model No. TN-RD 22 in high-sensitivity mode and a very-high sensitivity prototype. Each bias supply accommodates up to five dosimeters for 20 dosimeters per system. Sensitivity of detectors, defined as the mV/C kg(-1), was measured free in air with the bubble side of the dosimeter facing the x-ray field with a constant exposure. All dosimeter models' angular response showed a marked decrease in response when oriented between 120 degrees and 150 degrees and between at 190 degrees and 220 degrees relative to the incident beam. Sensitivity was evaluated for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh target-filter combinations. The individual dosimeter model sensitivity was 4.45 x 10(4) mV/C kg(-1) (11.47 mV R-1) for TN-502RDS (micro); 5.93 x 10(4) mV per C kg(-1) (15.31 mV R-1) for TN-1002RD; 6.06 x 10(4) mV/C kg(-1) (15.63 mV R-1) for TN-1002RDI; 9.49 x 10(4) mV per C kg(-1) (24.49 mV R-1) for TN-1002RDM (micro); and 11.20 x 104 mV/C kg(-1) (28.82 mV R-1) for TN-1002RDS (micro). The energy response is presented and is observed to vary with dosimeter model, generally increasing with tube potential through the mammography energy range. An intercomparison of the high-sensitivity mode of TN-RD-22 was made to the very-high sensitivity bias power supply using a Mo/Mo target-filter. The very-high sensitivity-bias power supply increased dosimeter response by 1.45 +/- 0.04 for dosimeter models TN-1002RD and TN-1002RDM. The responses of all dosimeter models were found to be linear for tube potentials of between 24 and 48 kVp. Dosimeters showed a reproducibility varying from 15.5% to 31.8% depending on the model of dosimeter. Micro MOSFETS model Nos. TN-1002RDS and TN-1002RDM used in conjunction with their respective high-sensitivity and ultrahigh- sensitivity bias supplies provided the highest sensitivity response of the models evaluated. Either micro MOSFETS model No. TN-1002RDS or TN-1002RDM used in conjunction with the appropriate bias supply provide the best choice for clinical mammography applications. Under these conditions, MOSFET dosimeters can provide a viable option as a dosimeter in the mammography energy range (22-50 kVp). The clinical application of MOSFET dosimeters must take into account the energy dependence and reproducibility to ensure accurate measurements. (c) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 520
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization of high-sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters system and LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters for use in diagnostic radiology
    Dong, SL
    Chu, TC
    Lan, GY
    Wu, TH
    Lin, YC
    Lee, JS
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2002, 57 (06) : 883 - 891
  • [2] Free in air characterization of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters using computed tomography radiation beam delivery system
    Hussain, I.
    Anderson, S.
    Yee, B.
    Kaufman, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2348 - 2348
  • [3] Calibration and error analysis of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters for computed tomography radiation dosimetry
    Trattner, Sigal
    Prinsen, Peter
    Wiegert, Jens
    Gerland, Elazar-Lars
    Shefer, Efrat
    Morton, Tom
    Thompson, Carla M.
    Yagil, Yoad
    Cheng, Bin
    Jambawalikar, Sachin
    Al-Senan, Rani
    Amurao, Maxwell
    Halliburton, Sandra S.
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (12) : 6589 - 6602
  • [4] AlInN/InN metal oxide semiconductor heterostructure field effect transistor
    Islam, Md. Sherajul
    Muhtadi, Sakib M.
    Hasan, Md. Tanvir
    Bhuiyan, Ashraful G.
    Islam, Md. Rafiqul
    Hashimoto, A.
    Yamamoto, A.
    [J]. PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI C: CURRENT TOPICS IN SOLID STATE PHYSICS, VOL 7, NO 7-8, 2010, 7 (7-8):
  • [5] AlGaN/GaN metal oxide semiconductor heterostructure field effect transistor
    Khan, MA
    Hu, X
    Sumin, G
    Lunev, A
    Yang, J
    Gaska, R
    Shur, MS
    [J]. IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, 2000, 21 (02) : 63 - 65
  • [6] BALLISTIC METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR
    NATORI, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1994, 76 (08) : 4879 - 4890
  • [7] COMPLEMENTARY METAL-OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR-COMPATIBLE JUNCTION FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR CHARACTERIZATION
    MARCOUX, J
    ORCHARDWEBB, J
    CURRIE, JF
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1987, 65 (08) : 982 - 986
  • [8] Fabrication and Characterization of a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET)-based Micro pH Sensor
    Seven, Fikri
    Sen, Mustafa
    [J]. 2020 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CONGRESS (TIPTEKNO), 2020,
  • [9] Characterization of strain for high-performance metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect-transistor
    Kosemura, Daisuke
    Kakemura, Yasuto
    Yoshida, Tetsuya
    Ogura, Atsushi
    Kohno, Masayuki
    Nishita, Tatsuo
    Nakanishi, Toshio
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2008, 47 (04) : 2538 - 2543
  • [10] Rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition of zirconium oxide for metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor application
    Chang, JP
    Lin, YS
    Chu, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2001, 19 (05): : 1782 - 1787