Waveform-based microseismic location using stochastic optimization algorithms: A parameter tuning workflow

被引:19
|
作者
Li, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Jingqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Yujiang [4 ]
Tan, Yuyang [5 ]
Walda, Jan [4 ]
Zhao, Zhengguang [6 ]
Gajewski, Dirk [4 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Key Lab Metallogen Predict Nonferrous Met & Geol, Minist Educ, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Key Lab Nonferrous Resources & Geol Hazard, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent S Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hamburg, Inst Geophys, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data processing; Algorithms; Geophysics; Inverse problems; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC EVENT LOCATION; LOW-CLAY SHALE; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; INVERSION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2019.01.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A fast and accurate source location estimation is the foundation for passive seismic processing and interpretation. Waveform-based location methods become more and more popular for analysis of both natural and induced seismicity. We utilize stochastic optimization algorithms to speed up microseismic location. Two waveform-based location methods (i.e. diffraction stacking and cross correlation stacking) are adopted to test the performance of three algorithms (i.e. particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and neighbourhood algorithm). In order to enhance the algorithmic performance, we propose a parameter tuning workflow which consists of two types of repeated tests. One type is multiple independent tests for a single event and the other involves tests of multiple events. The success rate, speedup, location uncertainty and bias are investigated to assess the algorithmic performances. We apply the workflow to a field dataset of mining induced seismicity and obtain preferential algorithm(s) with optimized ranges of control parameters. Synthetic tests are also conducted to demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed parameter tuning workflow. Given the two imaging operators, differential evolution is demonstrated to be the preferential one accounting for both algorithmic robustness and efficiency. Meanwhile, the workflow also examines the characteristics of different imaging operators. Cross correlation stacking proves to be simpler and more robust than its counterpart. Though the workflow is developed for microseismic location, it can also be adapted for other seismic inversion problems (e.g., source mechanism inversion) and ensure the algorithmic robustness and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 127
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microseismic event location using global optimization algorithms: An integrated and automated workflow
    Lagos, Soledad R.
    Velis, Danilo R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 149 : 18 - 24
  • [2] Waveform-based source location method using a source parameter isolation strategy
    Huang, Chao
    Dong, Liang-Guo
    Liu, Yu-Zhu
    Yang, Ji-Zhong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (05) : KS85 - KS97
  • [3] Automatic waveform-based source-location imaging using deep learning extracted microseismic signals
    Saad, Omar M.
    Chen, Yangkang
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (06) : KS171 - KS183
  • [4] Downhole microseismic location method based on waveform stacking optimization
    Mao, Qinghui
    Chen, Junwu
    Wang, Peng
    Zhong, Yu
    Zu, Man
    Gui, Zhixian
    Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2023, 58 (05): : 1164 - 1172
  • [5] Waveform-based identification of structural damage using the combined finite element method and microgenetic algorithms
    Lee, SY
    Wooh, SC
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (09) : 1464 - 1472
  • [6] Cross-correlation stacking-based microseismic source location using three metaheuristic optimization algorithms
    Zhou, Jian
    Shen, Xiaojie
    Qiu, Yingui
    Shi, Xiuzhi
    Khandelwal, Manoj
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 126
  • [7] Waveform-Based Speech Recognition Using Hidden Filter Models: Parameter Selection and Sensitivity to Power Normalization
    Sheikhzadeh, Hamid
    Deng, Li
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SPEECH AND AUDIO PROCESSING, 1994, 2 (01): : 80 - 89
  • [8] Parameter identification of induction motors using stochastic optimization algorithms
    Ursem, RK
    Vadstrup, P
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2004, 4 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [9] Recent Advances and Challenges of Waveform-Based Seismic Location Methods at Multiple Scales
    Li, Lei
    Tan, Jingqiang
    Schwarz, Benjamin
    Stanek, Frantisek
    Poiata, Natalia
    Shi, Peidong
    Diekmann, Leon
    Eisner, Leo
    Gajewski, Dirk
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 58 (01)
  • [10] DMLoc: Automatic Microseismic Locating Workflow Based on Deep Learning and Waveform Migration
    Liu, Yizhuo
    Zheng, Jing
    Wang, Ruijia
    Peng, Suping
    Shen, Shuaishuai
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 95 (05) : 2997 - 3007