Estimating Producers' Preferences for Sod Attributes: A Combined Approach of Discrete Choice Experiments and Eye-tracking Technology

被引:2
|
作者
Ge, Candi [1 ]
Chung, Chanjin [2 ]
Boyer, Tracy A. [3 ]
Palma, Marco [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Freshwater Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53204 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
attribute non-attendance; discrete choice; scale change; sod producer; sod attributes; willingness-to-accept; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; NON-ATTENDANCE; TURFGRASS ATTRIBUTES; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; DROUGHT; BENEFITS; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI15218-20
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
This study combines a discrete choice experiment and eye-tracking technology to investigate producers' preferences for sod attributes including winterkill reduction, shade tolerance, drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, and maintenance cost reduction. Our study results show that sod producers valued drought tolerance the most, followed by shade tolerance, winterkill reduction, salinity tolerance, and lastly, a 10% maintenance cost reduction. Choice survey data revealed the existence of attribute nonattendance, i.e., respondents skipped some attributes, but statistical tests detected no clear evidence about the role of individuals' attention changes on their willingness-to accept estimates. Estimates using a scale heterogeneity multinomial logit model indicate an overall learning effect as respondents made choices in the survey. Producers' willingness-to-accept were generally higher than consumers' willingness-to-pay for the improved sod variety attributes, except for the drought tolerance attribute. However, the rankings for these attributes were the same between consumers and producers.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1596
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing the consistency of preferences in discrete choice experiments: an eye tracking study
    Segovia, Michelle S.
    Palma, Marco A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 48 (03) : 624 - 664
  • [2] Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking
    Fraser, Iain
    Balcombe, Kelvin
    Williams, Louis
    McSorley, Eugene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 94
  • [3] Discrete choice experiments with eye-tracking: How far we have come and ways forward
    Bansal, Prateek
    Kim, Eui-Jin
    Ozdemir, Semra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 51
  • [4] Examining the relationship between visual attention and stated preferences: A discrete choice experiment using eye-tracking
    Balcombe, Kelvin
    Fraser, Iain
    Williams, Louis
    McSorley, Eugene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2017, 144 : 238 - 257
  • [5] An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Vass, Caroline
    Rigby, Dan
    Tate, Kelly
    Stewart, Andrew
    Payne, Katherine
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 38 (06) : 658 - 672
  • [6] Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments
    van der Pol, M
    Cairns, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) : 1459 - 1470
  • [7] Using eye-tracking as an aid to design on-screen choice experiments
    Dudinskaya, Emilia Cubero
    Naspetti, Simona
    Zanoli, Raffaele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2020, 36
  • [8] Consumer preferences for nutritional claims: An exploration of attention and choice based on an eye-tracking choice experiment
    Ballco, Petjon
    de-Magistris, Tiziana
    Caputo, Vincenzina
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 116 : 37 - 48
  • [9] Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?
    Uggeldahl, Kennet
    Jacobsen, Catrine
    Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark
    Olsen, Soren Boye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2016, 20 : 35 - 48
  • [10] A Query Approach to Modeling Attendance to Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Kemper, Nathan
    Popp, Jennie
    Nayga, Rodolfo M.
    Bazzani, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2024, 49 (02)