Personality-Based Profile Matching in Personnel Selection: Estimates of Method Prevalence and Criterion-Related Validity

被引:8
|
作者
Kulas, John T. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Cloud State Univ, St Cloud, MN 56301 USA
关键词
JOB-PERFORMANCE; 5-FACTOR MODEL; HETEROGENEITY; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00491.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Profile matching refers to selection based on applicant similarity to a pre-specified pattern of standing across several mutually considered personality dimensions. Although many investigations support the use of personality data through univariate, linear-based selection methodologies, there is no evidence within the literature that supports (or refutes) the use of profile matching. Regardless, a phone survey revealed that 62 per cent of consultative vendor organisations implement some form of profile matching. The current study addresses this scientistpractitioner void by investigating the broad, cross-organisational viability of three different profile matching strategies (profile band specification, profile similarity estimation, and configural scoring). Although some specifications of profile matching came close (empirically) to challenging linear regression cross-validation estimates, the profile matching strategy is considered to be burdened with additional conceptual concerns (primarily resulting from a lack of formal model specification) as well as practical limitations (for example, the likely creation of an artificial predictor ceiling). Linear regression is presented here as the more effective use of multi-trait information; however, if practitioners continue to utilise profile matching, it is suggested that they consider either adopting a configural scoring approach or referencing an index of profile similarity rather than retaining and applying desired profile bands.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 542
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The criterion-related validity of a short commensurate measure of personality-based person-organization fit
    Iyer, Punya V.
    Oostrom, Janneke K.
    Serlie, Alec W.
    van Dam, Arjan
    Born, Marise Ph.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 28 (02) : 143 - 162
  • [2] The criterion-related validity of conscientiousness in personnel selection: A meta-analytic reality check
    Watrin, Luc
    Weihrauch, Lucas
    Wilhelm, Oliver
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 31 (02) : 286 - 301
  • [3] Content Validity Does Matter for the Criterion-Related Validity of Personality Tests
    Davison, H. Kristl
    Bing, Mark N.
    INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (04): : 501 - 503
  • [4] Supervisory opportunity to observe moderates criterion-related validity estimates
    MacLane, Charles N.
    Cucina, Jeffrey M.
    Busciglio, Henry H.
    Su, Chihwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 28 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [5] CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ESTIMATES OF CONTENT AND CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY VALUES
    CARRIER, MR
    DALESSIO, AT
    BROWN, SH
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 43 (01) : 85 - 100
  • [6] Criterion-related validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory in a prison sample
    Poythress, NG
    Edens, JF
    Lilienfeld, SO
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (04) : 426 - 430
  • [7] Logical and judgmental moderators of the criterion-related validity of personality scales
    Warr, P
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 72 : 187 - 204
  • [8] PERSONALITY AND JOB COMPETENCES - THE CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY OF SOME PERSONALITY-VARIABLES
    ROBERTSON, IT
    KINDER, A
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 66 : 225 - 244
  • [9] SELECTION OF HETEROSOCIAL SKILLS .1. CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
    KUPKE, TE
    HOBBS, SA
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1979, 10 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [10] The variability of criterion-related validity estimates among interviewers and interview panels
    Van Iddekinge, Chad H.
    Sager, Christopher E.
    Burnfield, Jennifer L.
    Heffner, Tonia S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 14 (03) : 193 - 205