On the coke deposition in dry reforming of methane at elevated pressures

被引:91
|
作者
Schulz, Linus A. [1 ,2 ]
Kahle, Lea C. S. [3 ]
Delgado, Karla Herrera [3 ]
Schunk, Stephan A. [4 ]
Jentys, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Deutschmann, Olaf [3 ]
Lercher, Johannes A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Chem, D-85747 Garching, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Catalysis Res Ctr, D-85747 Garching, Germany
[3] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Chem Technol & Polymer Chem, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Hte GmbH, D-69123 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Dry reforming of methane; Reverse water gas shift; Ni; Pt; Hexaaluminate support; Coke formation; Isotope labeling; Reaction flow analysis; CARBON DEPOSITION; SYNTHESIS GAS; SUPPORTED NI; CATALYSTS; CO2; CH4; GROWTH; SYNGAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.002
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The reaction pathways leading to coke formation in dry reforming on Ni and Pt-based catalysts were investigated. Using isotope-labeled reactants (i.e., CH4 + (CO2)-C-13 reversible arrow 2CO + 2H(2)) showed that initially (CO2)-C-13 is converted faster than CH4 and that this higher activity leads to a higher concentration of (CO)-C-13 compared with (CO)-C-12 in the product stream, suggesting little isotope scrambling among products at this stage. Gasification of carbon deposits was found to be an important pathway enhancing the catalyst stability. Analysis of the pathways leading to carbon deposits suggests that coke is formed predominantly via reverse Boudouard reaction on Ni, while both metals contribute to CH4 dissociation. The pronounced reversibility of the C-H and C-O bond formation and cleavage was also shown by the presence of (CH4)-C-13 formed from (CO2)-C-13 and (CO)-C-12 formed from (CH4)-C-12. Numeric calculations complementing the experimental results led to the proposal of a reaction pathway for the surface reactions, accounting for the differences between Ni and Pt. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 607
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon deposition on methane dry reforming catalysts at higher pressures.
    Shamsi, A
    Johnson, CD
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 221 : U501 - U501
  • [2] Parametric study of catalytic dry reforming of methane for syngas production at elevated pressures
    Chein, R. Y.
    Hsu, W. H.
    Yu, C. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (21) : 14485 - 14500
  • [3] A review on coke management during dry reforming of methane
    Muraza, Oki
    Galadima, Ahmad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 39 (09) : 1196 - 1216
  • [4] Coke-resistant catalysts for dry reforming of methane
    Zhang, Junshe
    Li, Fanxing
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [5] Coke Suppression by Holmium Promoter in Dry Reforming of Methane
    Fakeeha, A. H.
    Naeem, M. A.
    Abasaeed, A. E.
    Ibrahim, A. A.
    Khan, W. U.
    Al Fatesh, Ahmed Sadeq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN, 2016, 38 (03): : 388 - 397
  • [6] Carbon deposition in methane reforming with carbon dioxide dry reforming
    Gronchi, P.
    Fumagalli, D.
    Del Rosso, R.
    Centola, P.
    [J]. Journal of thermal analysis, 1996, 47 (01): : 227 - 234
  • [7] Carbon deposition in methane reforming with carbon dioxide - Dry reforming
    Gronchi, P
    Fumagalli, D
    Del Rosso, R
    Centola, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 1996, 47 (01) : 227 - 234
  • [8] Study of Coke Deposition on Ni Catalysts for Methane Reforming to Syngas
    Jiang Hongtao
    Hua Wei
    Ji Jianbing
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2013, 25 (05) : 859 - 868
  • [9] Promoted coke resistance of Ni by surface carbon for the dry reforming of methane
    Guo, Zhichao
    Chen, Shuyue
    Yang, Bo
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (03)
  • [10] Utilizing bimetallic catalysts to mitigate coke formation in dry reforming of methane
    Bitters, Jaylin Sasson
    He, Tina
    Nestler, Elizabeth
    Senanayake, Sanjaya D.
    Chen, Jingguang G.
    Zhang, Cheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY, 2022, 68 : 124 - 142