The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2cm

被引:71
|
作者
Chen, Tao [1 ]
Xu, Lili [2 ]
Dong, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Li, Yue [3 ]
Yu, Jiang [1 ]
Xiong, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guoxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Engn Technol Res Ctr Minimally Inv, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Med Image Ctr, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Digest Endoscopy, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Prognosis; Stomach neoplasms; Endosonography; Tomography; x-ray computed; SUBMUCOSAL TUMORS; RISK; DIAGNOSIS; PREDICTION; MALIGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; FEATURES; SURGERY; GIST; KIT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5945-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) features of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) for assessing potential malignancy and prognosis.MethodsFifty consecutive patients with primary gastric GISTs larger than 2cm were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The association of CT and EUS features with malignancy was analyzed using univariate and stepwise logistic regression method. The agreement between EUS/CT lesion size and pathologic tumor size was analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value, and the association of imaging features with mitotic counts was further analyzed using univariate analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the value of imaging features for predicting the prognosis of GIST patients.ResultsTumor size >5cm and an exophytic/mixed growth pattern on CT as well as tumor size >5cm and the presence of cystic spaces on EUS were independent predictors of highly malignant GISTs (all p<0.05). The ICC values of CT/EUS lesion size relative to pathologic tumor size showed very good reliability (0.853 for EUS and 0.831 for CT). Only tumor shape and growth pattern on CT were significant for predicting mitotic index (both p<0.05). Direct organ invasion on CT (p=0.036; hazard ratio [HR]=11.891) and serosal invasion on EUS (p=0.015; HR=8.223) were independent adverse prognostic factors.ConclusionsCT features may be more useful than EUS features for predicting tumor mitotic index. In addition, preoperative imaging features can help predict the prognosis of gastric GISTs.Key Points center dot Both CT and EUS features can be used for risk stratification of gastric GISTs larger than 2cm.center dot CT features performed better than EUS features for predicting tumor mitotic index.center dot Preoperative imaging features can help predict the prognosis of gastric GISTs.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2489
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm
    Tao Chen
    Lili Xu
    Xiaoyu Dong
    Yue Li
    Jiang Yu
    Wei Xiong
    Guoxin Li
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 2481 - 2489
  • [2] Meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm
    Xiao Lian
    Fan Feng
    Man Guo
    Lei Cai
    Zhen Liu
    Shushang Liu
    Shuao Xiao
    Gaozan Zheng
    Guanghui Xu
    Hongwei Zhang
    BMC Cancer, 17
  • [3] Meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm
    Lian, Xiao
    Feng, Fan
    Guo, Man
    Cai, Lei
    Liu, Zhen
    Liu, Shushang
    Xiao, Shuao
    Zheng, Gaozan
    Xu, Guanghui
    Zhang, Hongwei
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [4] Multi-Slice CT Features Predict Pathological Risk Classification in Gastric Stromal Tumors Larger Than 2 cm: A Retrospective Study
    Wang, Sikai
    Dai, Ping
    Si, Guangyan
    Zeng, Mengsu
    Wang, Mingliang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (20)
  • [5] Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Larger Than 5 cm: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
    Qiu, Guanglin
    Wang, Jing
    Che, Xiangming
    He, Shicai
    Wei, Chao
    Li, Xuqi
    Pang, Ke
    Fan, Lin
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2017, 24 (06) : 582 - 589
  • [6] Surgical Strategy for the Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Larger Than 5 cm: Laparoscopic Surgery is Feasible, Safe, and Oncologically Acceptable
    Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
    Nakajima, Kiyokazu
    Miyazaki, Yasuaki
    Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Yamasaki, Makoto
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    Takiguchi, Shuji
    Nishida, Toshirou
    Mori, Masaki
    Doki, Yuichiro
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (02): : 114 - 118
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison
    Jianxian Lin
    Changming Huang
    Chaohui Zheng
    Ping Li
    Jianwei Xie
    Jiabin Wang
    Jun Lu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2577 - 2583
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison
    Lin, Jianxian
    Huang, Changming
    Zheng, Chaohui
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jianwei
    Wang, Jiabin
    Lu, Jun
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (09): : 2577 - 2583
  • [9] EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm
    Lee, Jeong Hoon
    Cho, Charles J.
    Park, Young Soo
    Ahn, Ji Yong
    Kim, Do Hoon
    Na, Hee Kyong
    Choi, Kee Don
    Song, Ho June
    Lee, Gin Hyug
    Jung, Hwoon-Yong
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 51 (04) : 486 - 493
  • [10] Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2cm
    Meng, Yan
    Li, Wei
    Han, Lu
    Zhang, Qiang
    Gong, Wei
    Cai, Jianqun
    Li, Aimin
    Yan, Qun
    Lai, Qiuhua
    Yu, Jiang
    Bai, Lan
    Liu, Side
    Li, Yue
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (10) : 1693 - 1697