The impact of climate change uncertainty on California's vegetation and adaptation management

被引:45
|
作者
Thorne, James H. [1 ]
Choe, Hyeyeong [1 ]
Boynton, Ryan M. [1 ]
Bjorkman, Jacquelyn [1 ]
Albright, Whitney [2 ]
Nydick, Koren [3 ]
Flint, Alan L. [4 ]
Flint, Lorraine E. [4 ]
Schwartz, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, 1416 Ninth St,Suite 1221, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[3] Sequoia & Kings Canyon Natl Pk, Three Rivers, CA 93271 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Placer Hall,6000 J St, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2017年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
California vegetation; climate change exposure; ecological forecast; natural resource management; policy implications; risk assessment; watershed planning; SIERRA-NEVADA; GLOBAL CHANGE; FOREST; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; PATTERNS; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2021
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The impacts of different emission levels and climate change conditions to landscape-scale natural vegetation could have large repercussions for ecosystem services and environmental health. We forecast the risk-reduction benefits to natural landscapes of lowering business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions by comparing the extent and spatial patterns of climate exposure to dominant vegetation under current emissions trajectories (Representative Concentration Pathway, RCP8.5) and envisioned Paris Accord target emissions (RCP4.5). This comparison allows us to assess the ecosystem value of reaching targets to keep global temperature warming under 2 degrees C. Using 350,719 km(2) of natural lands in California, USA, and the mapped extents of 30 vegetation types, we identify each type's current bioclimatic envelope by the frequency with which it occupies current climate conditions. We then map the trajectory of each pixel's climate under the four climate futures to quantify areas expected to fall within, become marginal to (outside a 95% probability contour), or move beyond their current climate conditions by the end of the 21st century. In California, these four future climates represent temperature increases of 1.9-4.5 degrees C and a -24.8 to +22.9% change in annual precipitation by 2100. From 158,481 to 196,493 km(2) (45-56%) of California's natural vegetation is predicted to become highly climatically stressed under current emission levels (RCP8.5) under the drier and wetter global climate models, respectively. Vegetation in three California ecoregions critical to human welfare, southwestern CA, the Great Valley, and the Sierra Nevada Mountains, becomes >50% impacted, including 68% of the lands around Los Angeles and San Diego. However, reducing emissions to RCP4.5 levels reduces statewide climate exposure risk by 86,382-99,726 km(2). These projections are conservative baseline estimates because they do not account for amplified drought-related mortality, fires, and beetle outbreaks that have been observed during the current five-year drought. However, these results point to the landscape benefits of emission reductions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptation of California's electricity sector to climate change
    Vine, Edward
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 111 (01) : 75 - 99
  • [2] Adaptation of California’s electricity sector to climate change
    Edward Vine
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 111 : 75 - 99
  • [3] The Impact of Climate Change on California Rangelands and Livestock Management
    Ostoja, Steven M.
    Choe, Hyeyeong
    Thorne, James H.
    Alvarez, Pelayo
    Kerr, Amber
    Balachowski, Jennifer
    Reyes, Julian
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [4] The impact of climate change on California's ecosystem services
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Cameron, D. Richard
    Morris, Belinda
    Bachelet, Dominique
    Klausmeyer, Kirk
    MacKenzie, Jason
    Conklin, David R.
    Bratman, Gregrory N.
    Lenihan, James
    Haunreiter, Erik
    Daly, Christopher
    Roehrdanz, Patrick R.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 109 : 465 - 484
  • [5] The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services
    M. Rebecca Shaw
    Linwood Pendleton
    D. Richard Cameron
    Belinda Morris
    Dominique Bachelet
    Kirk Klausmeyer
    Jason MacKenzie
    David R. Conklin
    Gregrory N. Bratman
    James Lenihan
    Erik Haunreiter
    Christopher Daly
    Patrick R. Roehrdanz
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109 : 465 - 484
  • [6] Adapting California's water management to climate change
    Hanak, Ellen
    Lund, Jay R.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 111 (01) : 17 - 44
  • [7] Adapting California’s water management to climate change
    Ellen Hanak
    Jay R. Lund
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 111 : 17 - 44
  • [8] Climate Change Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Options for Forest Vegetation Management in the Northwestern USA
    Halofsky, Jessica E.
    Peterson, David L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (03)
  • [9] Climate change risk and adaptation costs for stormwater management in California coastal parklands
    Porse, Erik
    Poindexter, Cristina
    Carelton, Christian
    Stephens, Michael
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2023, 8 (03) : 293 - 306
  • [10] Climate change in California: scenarios and approaches for adaptation
    Michael D. Mastrandrea
    Amy L. Luers
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 111 : 5 - 16