Subcuticular Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:21
|
作者
Aabakke, Anna J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Krebs, Lone
Pipper, Christian B.
Secher, Niels J.
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holbaek Hosp, Smedelundsgade 60, DK-4300 Holbaek, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Juliane Marie Ctr, Res Unit, Womens & Childrens Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2013年 / 122卷 / 04期
关键词
PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; PERINATAL HEALTH; GLOBAL SURVEY; SECTION; EXPLANATION; APPEARANCE; ADULTS; SCALES;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare subcuticular sutures with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery in a randomized trial in which each woman was her own control. METHODS: Women undergoing cesarean delivery (primary, n=32; repeat, n=31) were randomized to side distribution of skin closure methods with one side of the skin incision closed with staples and the other side closed with subcuticular suture. The primary outcome was the overall preferred side of the scar 6 months post-operatively. Additional outcomes were women's preferred method of closure and cosmetically preferred side of the scar, difference in objective cosmetic scores (assessed by two plastic surgeons), and pain between the two sides of the scar and infection rate. RESULTS: Significantly more women preferred the stapled side, both overall (odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-5.52) and cosmetically (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.24-5.74), and reported staples as their preferred technique (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.10-3.64). There were no significant differences in pain scores at any time. One plastic surgeon preferred the stapled side (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.01-7.78) and scored it significantly higher on a cosmetic visual analog scale (P=.031); the other found no significant difference. There were four (6.8%) cases of infection-three on the sutured side and one bilateral. CONCLUSION: Staples were preferred to subcuticular suture for skin closure by women after cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 884
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Figueroa, Dana
    Jauk, Victoria Chapman
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Garner, Rachel
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Andrews, William W.
    Hauth, John
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [2] Absorbable Subcuticular Staples Compared With Suture for Cesarean Closure A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madsen, Annetta Madeline
    Dow, Margaret L.
    Hutz, Catherine E.
    Tessmer-Tuck, Jennifer A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 26S - 27S
  • [3] Randomized trial of surgical staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery
    Figueroa, Dana
    Paisley, Rachel
    Chapman-Jauk, Victoria
    Szychowski, Jeffrey
    Hauth, John
    Tita, Alan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S290 - S290
  • [4] Surgical Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial (vol 121, pg 33, 2013)
    Figueroa, D.
    Jauk, V. C.
    Szychowski, J. M.
    Garner, R.
    Biggio, J. R.
    Andrews, W. W.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (05): : 1113 - 1113
  • [5] A randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery
    Basha, Suzanne
    Rochon, Meredith
    Quinones, Joanne
    Coassolo, Kara
    Rust, Orion
    Smulian, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S4 - S4
  • [6] Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery
    Basha, Suzanne L.
    Rochon, Meredith L.
    Quinones, Joanne N.
    Coassolo, Kara M.
    Rust, Orion A.
    Smulian, John C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) : 285.e1 - 285.e8
  • [7] Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Buresch, Arin M.
    Van Arsdale, Anne
    Ferzli, Myriam
    Sahasrabudhe, Nicole
    Sun, Mengyang
    Bernstein, Jeffrey
    Bernstein, Peter S.
    Ngai, Ivan M.
    Garry, David J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (03): : 521 - 526
  • [8] Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reply
    Buresch, Arin M.
    Van Arsdale, Anne
    Garry, David J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (06): : 1387 - 1388
  • [9] Suture Compared With Staple Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mackeen, A. Dhanya
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    Fleisher, Jonah
    Vogell, Alison
    Han, Christina
    Sendecki, Jocelyn
    Pettker, Christian
    Leiby, Benjamin E.
    Baxter, Jason K.
    Sfakianaki, Anna
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06): : 1169 - 1175
  • [10] Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Rampersad, Roxane M.
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Stamilio, David
    Macones, George A.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03): : 682 - 690