Range verification methods in particle therapy: underlying physics and Monte Carlo modeling

被引:116
|
作者
Kraan, Aafke Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Dept Phys, Largo B Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
hadron interactions; Monte Carlo modeling; range verification; PET; prompt gamma; IN-BEAM PET; PROMPT GAMMA-RAYS; CARBON-ION THERAPY; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; TIME-OF-FLIGHT; PROTON THERAPY; COMPTON CAMERA; FLUKA CODE; DOSE RECONSTRUCTION; VIVO VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2015.00150
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Hadron therapy allows for highly conformal dose distributions and better sparing of organs-at-risk, thanks to the characteristic dose deposition as function of depth. However, the quality of hadron therapy treatments is closely connected with the ability to predict and achieve a given beam range in the patient. Currently, uncertainties in particle range lead to the employment of safety margins, at the expense of treatment quality. Much research in particle therapy is therefore aimed at developing methods to verify the particle range in patients. Non-invasive in vivo monitoring of the particle range can be performed by detecting secondary radiation, emitted from the patient as a result of nuclear interactions of charged hadrons with tissue, including beta(+) emitters, prompt photons, and charged fragments. The correctness of the dose delivery can be verified by comparing measured and pre-calculated distributions of the secondary particles. The reliability of Monte Carlo (MC) predictions is a key issue. Correctly modeling the production of secondaries is a non-trivial task, because it involves nuclear physics interactions at energies, where no rigorous theories exist to describe them. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of various aspects in modeling the physics processes for range verification with secondary particles produced in proton, carbon, and heavier ion irradiation. We discuss electromagnetic and nuclear interactions of charged hadrons in matter, which is followed by a summary of some widely used MC codes in hadron therapy. Then, we describe selected examples of how these codes have been validated and used in three range verification techniques: PET, prompt gamma, and charged particle detection. We include research studies and clinically applied methods. For each of the techniques, we point out advantages and disadvantages, as well as clinical challenges still to be addressed, focusing on MC simulation aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo methods in classical statistical physics
    Janke, Wolfhard
    COMPUTATIONAL MANY-PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2008, 739 : 79 - 140
  • [2] Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics
    Carlson, J.
    Gandolfi, S.
    Pederiva, F.
    Pieper, Steven C.
    Schiavilla, R.
    Schmidt, K. E.
    Wiringa, R. B.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2015, 87 (03) : 1067 - 1118
  • [3] Applications of Monte Carlo methods to statistical physics
    Binder, K
    REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 1997, 60 (05) : 487 - 559
  • [4] GPU accelerated Monte Carlo activation calculations for PET range verification in proton therapy
    McNamara, K.
    Schiavi, A.
    Brzezinski, K.
    Borys, D.
    Gajewski, J.
    Rucinski, A.
    Makkar, S.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A.
    Winterhalter, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1385 - S1386
  • [5] Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
    Andrieu, Christophe
    Doucet, Arnaud
    Holenstein, Roman
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2010, 72 : 269 - 342
  • [6] VERIFICATION OF A RESULT OF KRISTENSEN BY MONTE-CARLO MODELING
    SMYTH, VG
    MCEWAN, AC
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (10): : 1279 - 1280
  • [7] In vivo range verification in particle therapy
    Parodi, Katia
    Polf, Jerimy C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : E1036 - E1050
  • [8] Efficient Monte Carlo simulation methods in statistical physics
    Wang, JS
    MONTE CARLO AND QUASI-MONTE CARLO METHODS 2000, 2002, : 141 - 157