EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF TWO FEATURE SELECTION METHODS BASED ON GENERIC ALGORITHM

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ]
Zhai, Jun-Hai [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Hai-Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Baoding 071002, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ, Coll Math & Informat Sci, Key Lab Machine Learning & Computat Intelligence, Baoding 071002, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Math Phys & Informat Engn, Jinhua 321004, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data mining; feature selection; information entropy; inconsistency ratio; generic algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Feature selection is an important preprocessing in data mining, it aims to reduce the computational complexity of learning algorithm, and to improve the performance of data mining algorithms by removing irrelevant and redundant features. In the framework of discrete-valued feature selection, this paper experimentally compares two feature selection methods which are based on generic algorithm. The former uses relative classification information entropy to measure the significance of the candidate feature subsets, while the later uses inconsistency ratio to evaluate feature subsets. Both methods use genetic algorithm to search the optimal feature subset, we find by experimental comparisons that the former outperforms the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 245
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An experimental comparison of feature selection methods on two-class biomedical datasets
    Drotar, P.
    Gazda, J.
    Smekal, Z.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 66 : 1 - 10
  • [2] Comparison of two feature selection methods in Intrusion Detection Systems
    Fadaeieslam, M. J.
    Minaei-Bidgoli, B.
    Fathy, M.
    Soryani, M.
    [J]. 2007 CIT: 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 83 - +
  • [3] Experimental comparison of feature subset selection using GA and ACO algorithm
    Lee, Keunjoon
    Joo, Jinu
    Yang, Jihoon
    Honavar, Vasant
    [J]. ADVANCED DATA MINING AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4093 : 465 - 472
  • [4] An Experimental Comparison of Feature-Selection and Classification Methods for Microarray Datasets
    Cilia, Nicole Dalia
    De Stefano, Claudio
    Fontanella, Francesco
    Raimondo, Stefano
    di Freca, Alessandra Scotto
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (03)
  • [5] A two stages algorithm for feature selection based on feature score and genetic algorithms
    Huang, Zhi
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2019, 13 (02): : 139 - 151
  • [6] Two novel feature selection methods based on decomposition and composition
    Jiao, Na
    Miao, Duoqian
    Zhou, Jie
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7419 - 7426
  • [7] Two Parallelized Filter Methods for Feature Selection Based on Spark
    Marone, Reine Marie Ndela
    Camara, Fode
    Ndiaye, Samba
    Kande, Demba
    [J]. EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2019, 260 : 175 - 192
  • [8] Improved PSO-Based Feature Construction Algorithm Using Feature Selection Methods
    Mahanipour, Afsaneh
    Nezamabadi-pour, Hossein
    [J]. 2017 2ND CONFERENCE ON SWARM INTELLIGENCE AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CSIEC), 2017, : 1 - 5
  • [9] Performance Comparison of Feature Selection Methods
    Phyu, Thu Zar
    Oo, Nyein Nyein
    [J]. 2015 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (ICCMA 2015), 2016, 42
  • [10] Adapting the CMIM algorithm for multilabel feature selection. A comparison with existing methods
    Bermejo, Pablo
    Gamez, Jose A.
    Puerta, Jose M.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (01)