Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hansen, Richard A. [1 ]
Gartlehner, Gerald [2 ]
Webb, Aaron P.
Morgan, Laura C. [4 ]
Moore, Charity G. [3 ]
Jonas, Daniel E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Danube Univ, Dept Evidence Based Med & Clin Epidemiol, Krems, Austria
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Hlth Care Data Ctr, Ctr Res, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; cholinesterase inhibitor; donepezil; galantamine; rivastigmine; systematic review; meta-analysis; indirect comparison;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer's disease include the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine. We reviewed their evidence by searching MEDLINE (R), Embase, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 through 2007 (July) for placebo-controlled and comparative trials assessing cognition, function, behavior, global change, and safety. Thirty-three articles on 26 studies were included in the review. Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled data support the drugs' modest overall benefits for stabilizing or slowing decline in cognition, function, behavior, and clinical global change. Three open-label trials and one double-blind randomized trial directly compared donepezil with galantamine and rivastigmine. Results are conflicting; two studies suggest no differences in efficacy between compared drugs, while one study found donepezil to be more efficacious than galantamine, and one study found rivastigmine to be more efficacious than donepezil. Adjusted indirect comparison of placebo-controlled data did not find statistically significant differences among drugs with regard to cognition, but found the relative risk of global response to be better with donepezil and rivastigmine compared with galantamine (relative risk = 1.63 and 1.42, respectively). Indirect comparisons also favored donepezil over galantamine with regard to behavior. Across trials, the incidence of adverse events was generally lowest for donepezil and highest for rivastigmine.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 225
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil, Galantamine, Rivastigmine, and Memantine for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Chen-Chen
    Yu, Jin-Tai
    Wang, Hui-Fu
    Tan, Meng-Shan
    Meng, Xiang-Fei
    Wang, Chong
    Jiang, Teng
    Zhu, Xi-Chen
    Tan, Lan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2014, 41 (02) : 615 - 631
  • [2] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil, Galantamine, Rivastigmine, and Memantine for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
    Li, Dan-Dan
    Zhang, Ya-Hong
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhao, Pu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [3] A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine, and Memantine in Relation to Severity of Alzheimer's Disease
    Di Santo, Simona Gabriella
    Prinelli, Federica
    Adorni, Fulvio
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Musicco, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2013, 35 (02) : 349 - 361
  • [4] Metaanalysis of randomized trials of the efficacy and safety of Donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer disease
    Ritchie, CW
    Ames, D
    Clayton, T
    Lai, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 12 (04): : 358 - 369
  • [5] Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease - A systematic review
    Clegg, A
    Bryant, J
    Nicholson, T
    McIntyre, L
    De Broe, S
    Gerard, K
    Waugh, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (03) : 497 - 507
  • [6] Safety and Tolerability of Donepezil, Rivastigmine and Galantamine for Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: Systematic Review of the 'Real-World' Evidence
    Lockhart, I. A.
    Mitchell, S. A.
    Kelly, S.
    [J]. DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 28 (05) : 389 - 403
  • [7] A comparison of donepezil and galantamine in the treatment of cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
    Harry, RDJ
    Zakzanis, KK
    [J]. HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2005, 20 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [8] Efficacy of galantamine in treatment of Alzheimer's disease: an update meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Shao, Junhui
    Wei, Yawei
    Zhang, Hui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (04): : 7423 - 7430
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Psychostimulants for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2020, 53 (03) : 109 - 114
  • [10] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE REAL-WORLD STUDY EVIDENCE COMPARING THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF DONEPEZIL, RIVASTIGMINE AND GALANTAMINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
    Lockhart, I
    Mitchell, S.
    Kelly, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A350 - A351