Does Political Affirmative Action Work, and for Whom? Theory and Evidence on India's Scheduled Areas

被引:17
|
作者
Gulzar, Saad [1 ]
Haas, Nicholas [2 ]
Pasquale, Benjamin
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
ELECTORAL QUOTAS; LOCAL-POLITICS; REPRESENTATION; INSTITUTIONS; CASTE;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055420000532
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Does political affirmative action undermine or promote development? We present the first systematic analysis of Scheduled Areas in India, home to 100 million citizens, where local political office is reserved for the historically disadvantaged Scheduled Tribes. A newly constructed dataset of 217,000 villages allows us to probe conflicting hypotheses on the implementation of the world's largest workfare program, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. We find that reservations deliver no worseoveralloutcomes, that there are large gains for targeted minorities, and that these gains come at the cost of the relatively privileged, not other minorities. We also find improvements in other pro-poor programs, including a rural roads program and general public goods. Reservations more closely align benefits to each group's population share, allaying concerns of overcompensation for inequalities. Contrary to the expectations of skeptics, results indicate that affirmative action can redistribute both political and economic power without hindering overall development.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1246
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条