Erector spinae plane block combined with general anaesthesia versus conventional general anaesthesia in lumbar spine surgery

被引:13
|
作者
Siam, Ezzzt M. [1 ]
Aliaa, Doaa M. Abo [1 ]
Elmedany, Sally [1 ]
Abdelaa, Mohamed E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Anaesthesia & Surg Intens Care Dept, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA | 2020年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
Erector spinae plane block (ESP); multimodal analgesia (MMA); POSTOPERATIVE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; STRESS-RESPONSE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; INDEX; NERVE;
D O I
10.1080/11101849.2020.1821501
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Perioperative pain management should be planned preoperatively and based on usage of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities as a multimodal analgesia (MMA). Regional anaesthesia has superior advantages than opioid-based anaesthesia and is one of the cornerstones of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) especially in Patients undergoing spine surgery having already troublesome chronic pain and analgesic use. The present study was carried out to compare erector spinae plane block (ESP) with general anaesthesia versus conventional general anaesthesia in lumbar spine surgery. Materials and Methods: This study was done on thirty adult patients of both sexes scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly categorized into two equal groups (fifteen patients each); ESP was used for group I, and MMA was used for group II. Data was collected on anaesthetic requirements based on entropy monitoring and haemodynamic parameters, stress response measurement based on serum cortisol and blood glucose levels, controlled hypotensive anaesthesia; various drugs required and doses given, intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, postanaesthesia care unit data concerning recovery. Results: The group I (ESP) had statistically significant decrease of the response and the response-state entropy difference levels when compared to the group II (MMA) after stimulus and during the 1st time interval. The incidence of hemodynamic changes was significantly higher in the group I (ESP) than group II (MMA). Only the serum cortisol but not the blood glucose levels had statistically significant lower mean values 4 h postoperatively in group I (ESP) compared to group II (MMA). The patients received ESP had statistically significant lower mean expired isoflurane concentration, decreased emergence time, intraoperative fentanyl consumption and total dose of pethidine given up to 8 hrpostoperatively. Conclusions: Erector spinae plane block (ESP) can be considered safe and effective perioperative analgesic modality for lumbar spine simple decompression surgery. It helps in controlled hypotensive anaesthetic technique and decreases inhalational anaesthetics and intraoperative opioid requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 226
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erector spinae plane block for breast oncological procedure as a surrogate to general anaesthesia: A retrospective study
    Malawat, Aman
    Jethava, Durga
    Sachdev, Sudhir
    Jethava, Dharam Das
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (04) : 328 - 333
  • [2] Erector Spinae Plane Block as an adjuvant for pain management in lumbar spine surgery
    Serrano Tamayo, Ricardo
    Gutierrez Gutierrez, Alejandro
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 1003 - 1003
  • [3] The effect of erector spinae plane block on the use of anesthetic medications in lumbar spine surgery
    Nashibi, Masoud
    Sezari, Parisa
    Safari, Farhad
    Teymourian, Houman
    Asgari, Sogol
    Mottaghi, Kamran
    [J]. AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2023, 35 (04): : 228 - 235
  • [4] The erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review
    Rizkalla, James M.
    Holderread, Brendan
    Awad, Matthew
    Botros, Andro
    Syed, Ishaq Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 24 : 145 - 150
  • [5] Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Is There a Better Option?
    Tseng, Victor
    Xu, Jeff L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (01) : 92 - 92
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for acute pain management in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion under general anaesthesia
    El Ghamry, M. R.
    Elgebaly, A. S.
    Anwar, A. G.
    Shaddad, M. N.
    [J]. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 25 (06) : 26 - 31
  • [7] Assessing the Evidence for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery
    Peng, Qing
    Zhang, Liang
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 40 (09): : 560 - 561
  • [8] Comparing combined general/lumbar epidural anaesthesia to balanced general anaesthesia for major vascular surgery: a retrospective study
    van Veenendaal, A.
    Lages, N.
    Afonso, M. G.
    Tavares, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 5 - 5
  • [9] Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery
    Sinan Asar
    Sinem Sarı
    Ece Yamak Altinpulluk
    Mehmet Turgut
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 197 - 204
  • [10] Transient paraplegia in lumbar spine surgery—a potential complication following erector spinae plane block
    K. Guna Pratheep
    Kartik Sonawane
    Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    Balavenkat J Subramanian
    Rishi Mugesh Kanna
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 3719 - 3723