The effect of sieve mesh size on the abundance and composition of macrophyte-associated macrofaunal assemblages

被引:31
|
作者
Tanaka, MO
Leite, FPP
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Programa Posgrad Ecol, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Dept Zool, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
epifauna; macrofauna; Sargassum; sampling;
D O I
10.1023/A:1003589404593
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Sampling efficiency of several sieve mesh sizes (2, 1, 0.5, 0.2 and 0.1 mm) was tested in invertebrate assemblages associated to Sargassum stenophyllum. Samples of this brown algae were collected in southeastern Brazil to determine whether different sampling devices resulted in differences on the abundance and composition of the macrofauna. The 1 and 2 mm mesh sizes sampled less organisms, resulting in smaller abundances, densities, number of species and diversity, when compared to the other three mesh sizes, that achieved similar results. The most efficient sieve was the 0.5 mm mesh, sampling 85.8% and 94.5% of gammaridean and caprellidean amphipods, respectively, and 93.1% of gastropods. However, polychaetes and isopods were best sampled with the 0.2 mm sieve. Our results suggest that caution should be exercised when deciding on which sieve to use, as mesh sizes commonly used in benthic studies (1 and 0.5 mm) may result in very different estimates of diversity and abundance, as well as community structure patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The effect of sieve mesh size on the abundance and composition of macrophyte-associated macrofaunal assemblages
    Marcel Okamoto Tanaka
    Fosca Pedini Pereira Leite
    Hydrobiologia, 1998, 389 : 21 - 28
  • [2] Assessing differences in macrofaunal assemblages as a factor of sieve mesh size, distance between samples, and time of sampling
    Lenaïg G. Hemery
    Kristin K. Politano
    Sarah K. Henkel
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189
  • [3] Assessing differences in macrofaunal assemblages as a factor of sieve mesh size, distance between samples, and time of sampling
    Hemery, Lenaig G.
    Politano, Kristin K.
    Henkel, Sarah K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (08)
  • [4] INFLUENCE OF SIEVE MESH SIZE ON THE ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES OF MARINE MACROBENTHOS
    BACHELET, G
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE III-SCIENCES DE LA VIE-LIFE SCIENCES, 1985, 301 (18): : 795 - 798
  • [5] Macrobenthic community structure in tropical estuaries: the effect of sieve mesh-size and sampling depth on estimated abundance, biomass and composition
    Maria Cavalcanti Valenca, Ana Paula
    Parreira dos Santos, Paulo Jorge
    JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 2013, 93 (06) : 1441 - 1456
  • [6] Comprehensive Analysis of Microplastic Abundance in Macrophytes, Macrophyte-Associated Sediments, and Water in Tropical Coastal Lagoons in Sri Lanka
    Rathnayake, R. M. L. I.
    Amarathunga, A. A. D.
    De Silva, D. S. M.
    Mcgoran, A. R.
    Bakir, A.
    Sivyer, D. B.
    Reeve, C.
    Narangoda, S. R. C. N. K.
    WATER, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [7] The effect of wrack composition and diversity on macrofaunal assemblages in intertidal marine sediments
    Olabarria, Celia
    Incera, Monica
    Garrido, Josefina
    Rossi, Francesca
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2010, 396 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [8] EFFECT OF SIEVE MESH SIZE ON ANALYSIS OF RUMEN CONTENTS
    OWAGA, MLA
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1978, 42 (03): : 693 - 697
  • [9] The effect of sieve mesh size on the description of macroinvertebrate communities
    Barba, Beatriz
    Larranaga, Aitor
    Otermin, Ainhoa
    Basaguren, Ana
    Pozo, Jesus
    LIMNETICA, 2010, 29 (02): : 211 - 219
  • [10] Analysis of sampling methods of estuarine benthic macrofaunal assemblages: sampling gear, mesh size, and taxonomic resolution
    Gabriel B. G. Souza
    Francisco Barros
    Hydrobiologia, 2015, 743 : 157 - 174