Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach

被引:8
|
作者
Ball, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Barnes, Katelyn [1 ]
Laur, Celia [2 ,3 ]
Crowley, Jennifer [2 ,4 ]
Ray, Sumantra [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Need Nutr Educ Innovat Programme, MRC Elsie Widdowson Lab, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Waterloo, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Syst, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
HEALTH RESEARCH; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; CHILD HEALTH; STUDENTS; CARE; BEHAVIORS; ATTITUDES; GUIDELINES; CURRICULUM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. Design: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. Participants: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. Interventions: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. Main outcome measures: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36-108). Results: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. Conclusions: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Setting better priorities for medical education
    Vine, S
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (05) : 462 - 463
  • [2] Proceedings of the inaugural International Summit for Medical Nutrition Education and Research
    Laur, C.
    Ball, L.
    Ahankari, A. S.
    Avdagovska, M.
    Crowley, J.
    Deen, D.
    Douglas, P.
    Hark, L.
    Kohlmeier, M.
    Luzi, L.
    McCotter, L.
    Martyn, K.
    Nowson, C.
    Wall, C.
    Ray, S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 140 : 59 - 67
  • [3] Proceedings of the Second International Summit on Medical Nutrition Education and Research
    Barnes, K.
    Crowley, J.
    Laur, C.
    Ball, L.
    Ray, S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 140 : 68 - 72
  • [4] Perspectives from the third international summit on Medical Nutrition education and research
    Crowley, Jennifer Jean
    Laur, Celia
    Carter, Harrison David Edward
    Jones, Glenys
    Ray, Sumantra
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [6] Issues and priorities of medical education research in Asia
    Majumder, MAA
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2004, 33 (02) : 257 - 263
  • [7] Research priorities in medical education: A national study
    Tootoonchi, Mina
    Yamani, Nikoo
    Changiz, Tahereh
    Yousefy, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 17 (01): : 83 - 91
  • [8] Setting Medical Research Future Fund priorities: assessing the value of research
    Tuffaha, Haitham W.
    Andronis, Lazaros
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2017, 206 (02)
  • [9] Setting research priorities by applying the combined approach matrix
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 129 (04) : 368 - 375