A viewpoint on the reconstruction of destroyed UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Sites

The destruction of UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Sites (WHS) in conflict zones is devastating and continues to spark heated debate on reconstruction. Craft skills and construction materials can reinstate lost physical fabric. Communities who identify with WHS can ascribe meanings and values to the new fabric, thereby reclaiming their heritage. However, it is difficult to retrieve Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), including authenticity and integrity after irreversible damage has been done. If a World Heritage property is destroyed and later reconstructed, could it still be recognised as World Heritage?' is a critical question, open to debate. It was raised during a colloquium on Post-Trauma Reconstruction' held at ICOMOS Headquarters in March 2016. A participant commented that it is not possible to punish the State Party if a disaster or a war occurred', but there was no further exchange on this aspect'. In this paper, I argue that the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention may need to shift the spotlight from exceptional circumstances' to the contemporaneity of heritage. An oxymoron, perhaps, but it may sustain the culture of World Heritage inscription in conflict and post-conflict zones. A new category, in concert with three qualifying conditions, is proposed.