Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Lima Rodrigues, Natalia Cristina
Sala, Priscila Campos
Horie, Lilian Mika
Goncalves Dias, Maria Carolina
Matos de Miranda Torrinhas, Raquel Susana [1 ]
Romao, Joao Egidio, Jr. [2 ]
Cecconello, Ivan
Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Nutr & Cirurgia Metab Aparelho Digest LIM 35, Digest Surg Div,Dept Gastroenterol,Sch Med, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; AIR-DISPLACEMENT PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; NUTRITIONAL-STATUS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jrn.2012.01.024
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method. Design: This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight. Results: Mean estimated FM (kg [%]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 +/- 0.99 kg (30.11% +/- 1.30%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 +/- 1.11 kg (30.04% +/- 1.40%), with a 95% CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and %) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and %) when compared with ADP. Conclusion: The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients. (C) 2012 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation between skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the evaluation of body composition in patients on dialysis
    Laura Flores-Garcia, Ana
    Alicia Sanchez-Ramirez, Carmen
    Alberto Newton-Sanchez, Oscar
    Rojas-Larios, Fabian
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2018, 35 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness in Predicting Body Fat in Military Personnel
    Aandstad, Anders
    Holtberget, Kristian
    Hageberg, Rune
    Holme, Ingar
    Anderssen, Sigmund A.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2014, 179 (02) : 208 - 217
  • [3] Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness to Determine Body Fat Percentage among Young Women
    Thakur, Harshada Ketan
    Pareek, Priyanka A.
    Sayyad, Mehmood G.
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2022, 10 (01) : 295 - 301
  • [4] Assessment Methods of Body Fat in Recreational Marathon Runners: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Skinfold Thickness
    Nikolaidis, Pantelis T.
    Vancini, Rodrigo Luiz
    Andrade, Marilia dos Santos
    Barbosa de Lira, Claudio Andre
    Knechtle, Beat
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [5] Bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold thickness for the estimation of body fat: a population-based study in southern Brazil
    de Sousa, Clovis Arlindo
    de Macedo, Bruna
    de Azevedo, Luciane Coutinho
    Damasceno, Nagila Raquel Teixeira
    Ittermann, Till
    Voelzke, Henry
    Markus, Marcello Ricardo Paulista
    Helena, Ernani Tiaraju de Santa
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2025, 71 (01):
  • [6] Determination of Body Fat Mass: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
    Safer, Umut
    Safer, Vildan Binay
    Cintosun, Umit
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (05): : 895 - 896
  • [7] Determination of Body Fat Mass: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Reply
    Ledford, Cameron K.
    Butler, Robert J.
    Queen, Robin M.
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (05): : 896 - 896
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF SKINFOLD ANTHROPOMETRY AND BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS FOR MEASURING PERCENTAGE BODY-FAT IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS
    MADDEN, AM
    MORGAN, MY
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 21 (05) : 878 - 883
  • [9] ESTIMATION OF LEAN BODY-MASS BY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS COMPARED TO SKINFOLD ANTHROPOMETRY
    KUSHNER, RF
    HAAS, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1988, 42 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [10] Skinfold Thickness and Handheld Bioelectric Impedance Analysis Agreement in Body Fat Estimates
    Burns, Ryan D.
    Hannon, James C.
    Allen, Brett M.
    Cosgriff, J. E.
    Brusseau, Timothy A.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2013, 84 : A26 - A27