Finnish and Estonian teachers' views on the nature of intelligence

被引:0
|
作者
Ronkainen, Rina [1 ,2 ]
Kuusisto, Elina [3 ]
Eisenschmidt, Eve [1 ]
Tirri, Kirsi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Educ, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ, Fac Educ & Culture, Tampere, Finland
关键词
teacher; intelligence; mindset; convergent mixed-method design; Finland; Estonia; MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES; GROWTH MINDSET; IMPLICIT THEORIES; MOTIVATION; STUDENTS; ACHIEVEMENT; GIFTEDNESS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2022.959215
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate Finnish (n = 226) and Estonian (n = 347) teachers' views on the nature of intelligence. The study utilized a survey that included a qualitative, open-ended question about teachers' definition of intelligence and the quantitative inventory Implicit Theories of Intelligence (ITI). We then employed a convergent mixed-method design to understand teachers' views on the nature of intelligence. These views were divided into four main categories: the multidimensional nature of intelligence, manifestational nature of intelligence, developmental nature of intelligence, and creative nature of intelligence. Teachers from both countries highlighted cognitive features, such as memory, information processing, and problem-solving skills, as a part of the multidimensional nature of intelligence. In addition, teachers viewed intelligence as developmental when measured with the ITI inventory, indicating that intelligence is considered incremental. Lastly, when triangulating the qualitative and quantitative data of teachers' views on the nature of intelligence, only one statistically significant difference was found. Teachers with an entity view of intelligence also mentioned entity features in their own descriptions. The results showed that teachers views' on the nature of intelligence are rather broad; however, in future studies, teacher interviews and classroom observation might provide even more profound understanding of teachers' views on this topic.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ethical sensitivity of Finnish and Estonian teachers
    Ronkainen, Rina
    Kuusisto, Elina
    Eisenschmidt, Eve
    Tirri, Kirsi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2023, 52 (02) : 172 - 188
  • [2] Estonian and Finnish preschool teachers' conceptions of learning
    Niikko, Anneli
    Ugaste, Aino
    [J]. EUROPEAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 27 (01) : 40 - 52
  • [3] Estonian preschool teachers' views on learning in preschool
    Ugaste, Aino
    Tuul, Maire
    Niglas, Katrin
    Neudorf, Evelyn
    [J]. EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2014, 184 (03) : 370 - 385
  • [4] Identifying the problems that Finnish and Estonian teachers encounter in preschool
    Ugaste, Aino
    Niikko, Anneli
    [J]. EUROPEAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 23 (04) : 423 - 433
  • [5] PUBLIC VIEWS ON INTELLIGENCE - A FINNISH STUDY
    RATY, H
    SNELLMAN, L
    VORNANEN, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1993, 72 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [6] Teachers' views on the nature of models
    Justi, RS
    Gilbert, JK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2003, 25 (11) : 1369 - 1386
  • [7] Finnish teachers' views on co-teaching
    Kokko, Marjut
    Takala, Marjatta
    Pihlaja, Paivi
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2021, 48 (01) : 112 - 132
  • [8] Estonian and Finnish Pupils' Experiences of Religious Issues and Views on the Place of Religion in School
    Kallioniemi, Arto Viljami
    Schihalejev, Olga
    Kuusisto, Arniika
    Poulter, Saila
    [J]. RELIGION & EDUCATION, 2018, 45 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [9] Finnish and Iranian teachers' views on their competence to teach purpose
    Kuusisto, Elina
    Gholami, Khalil
    Tirri, Kirsi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR TEACHING, 2016, 42 (05) : 541 - 555
  • [10] Finnish student teachers' conceptions and experiences of nature
    Sarivaara, Erika
    Keskitalo, Pigga
    Ratinen, Ilkka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVENTURE EDUCATION AND OUTDOOR LEARNING, 2021, 21 (02): : 151 - 161