Value of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) for Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO): An Analysis of Efficiency and Complications in 1015 Cases

1015 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent transurethral resection (TURP) within the last seven years were analysed concerning indication, complications and results by evaluation of quality. The actual value of TURP should also be compared with that of alternative procedures of treatment. The transfusion rate (0.69%), TUR syndrome (0.78%) and the urinary infection rate (1.1%) are all very low. In 4.7% a reoperation was necessary, mostly due to significant haematuria. The mortality rate perioperatively was 0.1%. With regard to the voiding outcome, the uroflow relatively improved in 131% and post-void residual urine diminished in 81%. The low rate of complications, high efficiency and satisfaction of the patients are of importance also for the evaluation of alternative procedures. At the present time these modes of treatment do not have the potential to substitute for TURP.