Comparing the Efficiency of Heart Disease Prediction using Novel Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Decision Tree And SVM Algorithms

Aim: The aim of the work is to evaluate the accuracy and precision in predicting heart disease using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) Classification algorithms. Materials and Methods: Classification algorithm is appealed on a heart dataset which consists of 180 records. A framework for heart disease prediction in the medical sector comparing Random forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and SVM classifiers has been proposed and developed. The sample size was calculated as 55 in each group using G power 80%. Sample size was calculated using clincalc analysis, with alpha and beta values 0.05 and 0.5, 95% confidence, pretest power 80% and enrolment ratio 1. Results: The Novel Random Forest Algorithm (92.13%), Support Vector Machine (62.51%), Logistic Regression (84.89%), Decision Tree (86.25%) classifiers produce respectively. SVM, RF exists a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.001,p=.004;p<0.05).LR, RF exists a statistically insignificant difference between the two groups (p=.103, P=.080;p>0.05) both with confidence interval 95%. Hence Random forest is better than SVM, RF, DT classifiers. Conclusion: The results show that the performance of RF is better when compared with SVM, LR and DT in terms of both precision and accuracy.