Impact of concomitant popliteal vein thrombosis in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with endovascular early thrombus removal

被引:3
|
作者
Frey, Vincent [1 ]
Sebastian, Tim [2 ]
Barco, Stefano [2 ]
Spirk, David [3 ]
Hayoz, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Periard, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Kucher, Nils [2 ]
Betticher, Daniel [1 ]
Engelberger, Rolf P. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] HFR Fribourg Cantonal Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Angiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Pharmacol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] HFR Fribourg Cantonal Hosp, Div Angiol, Villars Sur Glane, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis; popliteal vein thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome; thrombolytic therapy; thrombosis; CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; FOLLOW-UP; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; DETERMINANTS; STATEMENT; REVISION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1024/0301-1526/a001017
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Catheter-based thrombus removal (CBTR) reduces the risk of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF-DVT). However, the impact of concomitant popliteal DVT on clinical and duplex sonographic outcomes is unknown. Patients and methods: In this post-hoc analysis including the entire cohort of the randomized controlled BERNUTIFUL trial (48 patients), we compared clinical (incidence/severity of PTS assessed by Villalta score and revised venous clinical severity scores, rVCSS), disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL, CIVIQ-20 survey) and duplex sonographic outcomes (patency, reflux, post-thrombotic lesions) at 12 months follow-up between patients with IF-DVT with and without concomitant popliteal DVT treated by CBTR. Results: Overall, 48 IF-DVT patients were included (48% men, median age of 50 years), of whom 17 (35%) presented with popliteal DVT. At baseline, patients with popliteal DVT were older, had a higher body mass index and more important leg swelling. At 12 months, freedom from PTS (93% vs 87%, P-0.17), median total Villalta score (1 vs 1.5; P-0.46), rVCSS (2 vs 1.5, P-0.5) and diseasespecific QOL (24 points vs 24 points, P-0.72) were similar between patient with and without popliteal DVT, respectively. Duplex sonographic outcomes were similar, except for more frequent popliteal post-thrombotic lesions and reflux (P-0.02) in patients with popliteal DVT. Conclusions: Relevant clinical outcomes 1 year after successful CBTR were favorable, regardless of the presence or absence of concomitant popliteal DVT. However, post-thrombotic popliteal vein lesions and reflux are more frequent in IF-DVT patients with popliteal involvement. Their impact on long-term outcomes remains to be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 290
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Update on early thrombus removal for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Baekgaard, Niels
    PHLEBOLOGIE, 2019, 48 (04) : 228 - 236
  • [2] Endovascular therapy for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Langer, Stephan
    Regeniter, Philipp
    PHLEBOLOGIE, 2021, 50 (03) : 208 - 214
  • [3] Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Huang, Michael H. H.
    Benishay, Elana T. T.
    Desai, Kush R. R.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05) : 459 - 463
  • [4] Cessation of anticoagulation therapy following endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Sebastian, Tim
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    Spirk, David
    Hakki, Lawrence O.
    Baumann, Frederic A.
    Spescha, Rebecca S.
    Kucher, Nils
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 48 (04) : 331 - 339
  • [5] Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis Analysis From a Stratified Multicenter Randomized Trial
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    Kearon, Clive
    Gu, Chu-Shu
    Julian, Jim A.
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    Kahn, Susan R.
    Jaff, Michael R.
    Razavi, Mahmood K.
    Kindzelski, Andrei L.
    Bashir, Riyaz
    Patel, Parag
    Sharafuddin, Mel
    Sichlau, Michael J.
    Saad, Wael E.
    Assi, Zakaria
    Hofmann, Lawrence V.
    Kennedy, Margaret
    Vedantham, Suresh
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 139 (09) : 1162 - 1173
  • [6] Cost Effectiveness of Early Endovenous Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United Kingdom
    Babigumira, Joseph B.
    Black, Stephen A.
    Lubinga, Solomon J.
    Pouncey, Anna L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (03) : 490 - 498
  • [7] Rivaroxaban or vitamin-K antagonists following early endovascular thrombus removal and stent placement for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Sebastian, Tim
    Hakki, Lawrence O.
    Spirk, David
    Baumann, Frederic A.
    Periard, Daniel
    Banyai, Martin
    Spescha, Rebecca S.
    Kucher, Nils
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2018, 172 : 86 - 93
  • [8] Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Who Benefits?
    Desai, Kush R.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 1171 - 1172
  • [9] Early Thrombus Removal in Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis to Prevent Post-thrombotic Syndrome
    van Rijn, Marie Josee E.
    Kakkos, Stavros K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 65 (02) : 169 - 170
  • [10] Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Casey, Edward T.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Zumaeta-Garcia, Magaly
    Elamin, Mohamed B.
    Shi, Qian
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Gloviczki, Peter
    Meissner, Mark
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (05) : 1463 - 1473