Early Paralytic Agents for ARDS? Yes, No, and Sometimes

被引:47
|
作者
Slutsky, Arthur S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Villar, Jesus [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Keenan Res Ctr, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp, Madrid, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Dr Negrin, Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunct Evaluat Res Netw, Res Unit, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2019年 / 380卷 / 21期
关键词
MECHANICAL VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMe1905627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Lung-protective ventilation, which includes low tidal volumes and limitation of plateau pressures, is the standard approach in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).(1) Almost a decade ago, the ARDS et Curarisation Systematique (ACURASYS) trial(2) showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, a strategy of 48 hours of deep sedation with muscle paralysis induced by an intravenous infusion of cisatracurium resulted in a lower incidence of barotrauma and higher adjusted overall survival at 90 days than deep sedation alone. These results were unexpected, since the intervention was performed only for the first 2 days, yet the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were . . .
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / 2063
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条