The Technical Efficiency of Beef Calf Production Systems: Evidence from a Survey in Hebei, China

被引:3
|
作者
Xue, Yongjie [1 ]
Yan, Jinling [2 ]
Cui, Yongfu [2 ]
Zhao, Huifeng [2 ]
Zhang, Ya'nan [2 ]
Ma, Changhai [2 ]
Zheng, Haijing [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250300, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Res Fac Agr, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600808, Japan
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
beef cattle; beef calf production systems; technical efficiency; super-efficiency DEA model with undesirable outputs; DEA-Tobit model; sustainable development; environmental regulation; LIVESTOCK; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture12101604
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Beef calf production is a source of sustainable development for the beef cattle industry. However, no comparative studies have reported on the technical efficiency of different beef calf production systems and their influencing factors. Based on data from 218 Chinese farmers and 12 governments, in the present study, we constructed data envelopment analysis (DEA) models and conducted a comparative analysis of the technical efficiency of the main three beef calf production systems: the Simmental calf intensive production system (CIPS), Simmental calf semi-intensive production system (SCIPS) and Holstein bull calf intensive production system (BCIPS). Using Tobit models, we analyzed the effects of various factors. The results show that: (1) The technical efficiency of the production system of Simmental calf is higher than that of Holstein bull calf, and the efficiency of SCIPS is higher than that of CIPS. The technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE) of different systems are significantly different. (2) Policy on the environment positively affected (p < 0.01) the TE, TPE and SE of CIPS, but negatively affected the PTE of SCIPS. Therefore, appropriate environmental regulations have a positive effect on production efficiency, which means that measures should be taken according to the reality and characteristics of the production system, and policies applicable to other systems or regions may not be applicable in a given case. (3) The management level and technology training had positive effects on the TE, TPE and SE of the three systems, while the number of years of production had a negative or no significant effect. Producers are not the "perfectly rational economic man", and the more knowledge they have, the more productive they will be. However, the "knowledge" referred to here is that which is adapted to production, not that which is traditional. The knowledge possessed by the producer should be updated continuously with the changes over time and the development of the industry, while outdated information is not considered as "knowledge" here. Therefore, to achieve sustainability, the government should fully consider the characteristics of the local breeding mode and, more importantly, the expected effects of policies to be implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on Technical Efficiency of Feed Use for Sustainable Beef Cattle Breeding in China: Evidence from 169 Beef Cattle Farmers
    Wei, Mian
    Zhou, Hui
    Ma, Jiliang
    Khan, Nawab
    Cao, Jianmin
    Hu, Xiangdong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [2] Rural Finance, Farmland Transfer and Agricultural Production Technical Efficiency: Evidence from China
    Li, Zongzhang
    [J]. 2010 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (ICIFE), 2010, : 364 - 368
  • [3] Does Internet use improve technical efficiency? Evidence from apple production in China
    Zhu, Xiaoke
    Hu, Ruifa
    Zhang, Chao
    Shi, Guanming
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 166
  • [4] Research on the impact of agricultural green production on farmers’ technical efficiency: evidence from China
    Chaoqiong Li
    Yuxing Shi
    Sufyan Ullah Khan
    Minjuan Zhao
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 38535 - 38551
  • [5] An analysis of the effect of agriculture subsidies on technical efficiency: Evidence from rapeseed production in China
    Liu, Fuxing
    Shahzad, Muhammad Aamir
    Feng, Zhongchao
    Wang, Lianfen
    He, Juan
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [6] Research on the impact of agricultural green production on farmers' technical efficiency: evidence from China
    Li, Chaoqiong
    Shi, Yuxing
    Khan, Sufyan Ullah
    Zhao, Minjuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (29) : 38535 - 38551
  • [7] Efficiency and technical progress in traditional and modern agriculture: evidence from rice production in China
    Xu, XS
    Jeffrey, SR
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 18 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [8] Effects of industrial air pollution on the technical efficiency of agricultural production: Evidence from China
    Wang, Zanxin
    Wei, Wei
    Zheng, Fangyuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 83
  • [9] Efficiency and technical progress in traditional and modern agriculture: Evidence from rice production in China
    Xu, XS
    Jeffrey, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 77 (05) : 1363 - 1363
  • [10] Can contract farming improve farmers' technical efficiency and income? Evidence from beef cattle farmers in China
    Liang, Yuan
    Bi, Wentai
    Zhang, Yuejie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7