Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances

被引:103
|
作者
Sasaki, Takehiro [1 ]
Furukawa, Takuya [2 ]
Iwasaki, Yuichi [3 ]
Seto, Mayumi [4 ]
Mori, Akira S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778563, Japan
[2] Yokohama Natl Univ, Grad Sch Environm & Informat Sci, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2408501, Japan
[3] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[4] Nara Womens Univ, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Nara 6308506, Japan
关键词
Alternative stable states; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem functioning; Feedback mechanism; Functional redundancy; Irreversibility; Press disturbance; Pulse disturbance; Response diversity; Resilience; MONGOLIAN RANGELANDS; RESPONSE DIVERSITY; FUNCTIONAL REDUNDANCY; ALTERNATIVE STATES; TRANSITION MODELS; PLANT-COMMUNITIES; BIODIVERSITY LOSS; REGIME SHIFTS; CORAL-REEFS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.019
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem resilience is the inherent ability to absorb various disturbances and reorganize while undergoing state changes to maintain critical functions. When ecosystem resilience is sufficiently degraded by disturbances, ecosystem is exposed at high risk of shifting from a desirable state to an undesirable state. Ecological thresholds represent the points where even small changes in environmental conditions associated with disturbances lead to switch between ecosystem states. There is a growing body of empirical evidence for such state transitions caused by anthropogenic disturbances in a variety of ecosystems. However, fewer studies addressed the interaction of anthropogenic and natural disturbances that often force an ecosystem to cross a threshold which an anthropogenic disturbance or a natural disturbance alone would not have achieved. This fact highlights how little is known about ecosystem dynamics under uncertainties around multiple and stochastic disturbances. Here, we present two perspectives for providing a predictive scientific basis to the management and conservation of ecosystems against multiple and stochastic disturbances. The first is management of predictable anthropogenic disturbances to maintain a sufficient level of biodiversity for ensuring ecosystem resilience (i.e., resilience-based management). Several biological diversity elements appear to confer ecosystem resilience, such as functional redundancy, response diversity, a dominant species, a foundation species, or a keystone species. The greatest research challenge is to identify key elements of biodiversity conferring ecosystem resilience for each context and to examine how we can manage and conserve them. The second is the identification of ecological thresholds along existing or experimental disturbance gradients. This will facilitate the development of indicators of proximity to thresholds as well as the understanding of threshold mechanisms. The implementation of forewarning indicators will be critical particularly when resilience-based management fails. The ability to detect an ecological threshold along disturbance gradients should therefore be essential to establish a backstop for preventing the threshold from being crossed. These perspectives can take us beyond simply invoking the precautionary principle of conserving biodiversity to a predictive science that informs practical solutions to cope with uncertainties and ecological surprises in a changing world. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 408
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Thresholds for Ecosystem-Based Management
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    Levin, Phillip S.
    Ainsworth, Cameron H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (01):
  • [2] Exploring ecosystem services interactions in the dryland: Socio-ecological drivers and thresholds for better ecosystem management
    Wang, Xingqi
    Wang, Bojie
    Cui, Fengqi
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [3] Optimizing zoning for ecological management in alpine region by combining ecosystem service supply and demand with ecosystem resilience
    Ji, Zhenqing
    Zou, Songbing
    Zhang, Wenyong
    Song, Fei
    Yuan, Tenggang
    Xu, Baorong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 365
  • [4] Perspectives on ecosystem management
    Haeuber, R
    Franklin, J
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (03) : 692 - 693
  • [5] Assessment of ecosystem resilience to hydroclimatic disturbances in India
    Sharma, Ashutosh
    Goyal, Manish Kumar
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : E432 - E441
  • [6] Perspectives in modelling ecological interaction networks for sustainable ecosystem management
    Quevreux, Pierre
    Brose, Ulrich
    Galiana, Nuria
    Potapov, Anton
    Thebault, Elisa
    Travers-Trolet, Morgane
    Wollrab, Sabine
    Jabot, Franck
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2024, 61 (03) : 410 - 416
  • [7] MULTIPLE-USE MANAGEMENT - ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVES OF MULTIPLE-USE MANAGEMENT
    SWANK, WT
    VANLEAR, DH
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1992, 2 (03) : 219 - 220
  • [8] Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem-based management
    Levin, Simon A.
    Lubchenco, Jane
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2008, 58 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [9] Stochastic ecosystem resilience and productivity: seeking a relationship
    Xu, CL
    Li, ZZ
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 156 (2-3) : 143 - 152
  • [10] Ecological resilience, robustness and vulnerability: how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management?
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Chollett, Iliana
    Bozec, Yves-Marie
    Wolff, Nicholas H.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 7 : 22 - 27