Simulation of an atmospheric SOFC and gas turbine hybrid system using Aspen Plus software

被引:28
|
作者
Ameri, Mohammad [1 ]
Mohammadi, Rasoul [1 ]
机构
[1] Power & Water Univ Technol, Mech & Energy Eng Dept, Combined Heat & Power Specialized Unit CHP, Tehran, Iran
关键词
SOFC; Gas turbine; Simulation; Aspen Plus; Power generation; Fuel cell; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; NATURAL-GAS; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/er.1941
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fuel cell is an energy conversion device that transforms the chemical energy of a fuel gas directly into electrical energy without direct combustion as an intermediate step. One type of fuel cell is the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with the operation temperature of around 1273 degrees K. The high operating temperature of the SOFC also provides excellent possibilities for feeding into a gas turbine (GT) to generate additional electricity. In this paper, an atmospheric SOFC and GT hybrid system have been simulated by application of Aspen Plus existing functions and unit operation modules. The study has shown that the system efficiency and voltage reduce continuously as the current density increases due to increase of Ohmic and concentration losses. However, the output power increases due to enhancement of the current density. Therefore, the system should operate at low current density if the goal is to generate power at higher efficiency. Moreover, if the goal is to produce more power, the system should operate at high current density. The simulation results indicate that the cycle can achieve high electrical generation efficiency (68.2%), which is very attractive compared to the ideal efficiency of combined cycle power plants around 50%. Moreover, a parametric analysis has been performed to assess the effects of the several operating condition variation on the system performance. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 425
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOFC/Gas Turbine Hybrid System: A simplified framework for dynamic simulation
    Rossi, Iacopo
    Traverso, Alberto
    Tucker, David
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 238 : 1543 - 1550
  • [2] Simulation of a reversible SOFC with Aspen Plus
    Hauck, Maximilian
    Herrmann, Stephan
    Spliethoff, Hartmut
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (15) : 10329 - 10340
  • [3] Simulation of a 220 kW hybrid SOFC gas turbine system and data comparison
    Yi, YF
    Smith, TP
    Brouwer, J
    Rao, AD
    Samuelsen, GS
    [J]. SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELLS VIII (SOFC VIII), 2003, 2003 (07): : 1442 - 1454
  • [4] Fuel Cell Simulation Using Aspen Plus Simulation Software
    Shirzadi, Pedram
    Masomi, Mir Esmaeel
    Nazemi, Ali Hekmat
    [J]. CHEMICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2022, 6 (03): : 197 - 211
  • [5] Simulation of Atmospheric and Vacuum Crude Units Using Aspen Plus
    Anitha, K.
    Shuwana, T.
    Kumar, V. R.
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 29 (18) : 1885 - 1894
  • [6] Simulation and exergy analysis of a hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC)-Gas Turbine System
    Calise, F.
    d'Accadia, M. Dentice
    Palombo, A.
    Vanoli, L.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2006, 31 (15) : 3278 - 3299
  • [7] Comparative evaluation of SOFC/gas turbine hybrid system options
    Litzinger, Kevin P.
    Veyo, Stephen E.
    Shockling, Larry A.
    Lundberg, Wayne L.
    [J]. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Vol 2, 2005, : 669 - 676
  • [8] Analysis of the design of a pressurized SOFC hybrid system using a fixed gas turbine design
    Park, S. K.
    Oh, K. S.
    Kim, T. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2007, 170 (01) : 130 - 139
  • [9] Simulation and Optimization of Solar Desalination Plant Using Aspen Plus Simulation Software
    Sajjad, Mojibul
    Rasul, Mohammad G.
    [J]. 6th BSME International Conference on Thermal Engineering, 2015, 105 : 739 - 750
  • [10] Hydrodesulfurization unit for natural gas condensate: Simulation based on Aspen Plus software
    Ahmadpour, Javad
    Ahmadi, Mahyar
    Javdani, Amirhossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2019, 135 (03) : 1943 - 1949