An Intraarticular Sacroiliac Steroid Injection Under the Guidance of Computed Tomography for Relieving Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Clinical Outcome Study with Two Years of Follow-Up

被引:5
|
作者
Sahin, Orcun [1 ]
Harman, Ali [2 ]
Akgun, Rahmi Can [1 ]
Tuncay, Ismail Cengiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiodiagnost, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Computed tomography; injection; pain; sacroiliac; LOW-BACK-PAIN; PROVOCATION TESTS; CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION; CT; ANATOMY; SPONDYLOARTHROPATHY; DIAGNOSIS; FLUOROSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; LASER;
D O I
10.5606/tjr.2012.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of an injection of a computed tomography (CT)-guided intraarticular steroid and a local anesthetic for the treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain over a two-year follow-up period. Patients and methods: Between January 2009 and December 2011, a total of 46 patients (18 males, 28 females; mean age 52.7 years; range 41 to 65 years) with SIJ pain who were scheduled to undergo an injection with a CT-guided intraarticular steroid and a local anesthetic were included. After properly prepared, the mixture of triamcinolone acetonide 80 mg and bupivacaine hydrochloride 4 cc was injected under CT guidance. The pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and after the injection. The clinical follow-up was performed the day after the injection as well as at one week, three weeks, and six months and in the last visit. The differences between the VAS scores before and after the injections were analyzed statistically. Results: The mean follow-up was 26.7 months (range 24 to 36 months). Eight out of 46 patients (17.4%) needed a second injection. Five of them (10.8%) failed to show improvement during the follow-up after the intraarticular cortisone injection. The overall success rate of the SIJ injection was 89.2%. The differences between the VAS scores before the injection and at intervals of one day, one week, three weeks, and six months were significantly lower. This response remained significant after a minimum of two years of follow-up with a median VAS score of 20.5 (min-max: 0-87). Conclusion: Sacroiliac joint injections under CT guidance are a sufficient treatment modality for pain and symptom control in patients suffering from pain due to active SIJ pathologies. They are safe and effective and can be used as an alternative treatment of choice for patients with long-term SIJ pain.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] An imaging review of sacroiliac joint injection under computed tomography guidance
    Block, BM
    Hobelmann, JG
    Murphy, KJ
    Grabow, TS
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (03) : 295 - 298
  • [2] Intraarticular Sacroiliac Joint Injection Under Computed Tomography Fluoroscopic Guidance: A Technical Note to Reduce Procedural Time and Radiation Dose
    Nam Chull Paik
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2016, 39 : 1057 - 1060
  • [3] Intraarticular Sacroiliac Joint Injection Under Computed Tomography Fluoroscopic Guidance: A Technical Note to Reduce Procedural Time and Radiation Dose
    Paik, Nam Chull
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (07) : 1057 - 1060
  • [4] Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: an anterior approach and clinical outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up
    Murakami, Eiichi
    Kurosawa, Daisuke
    Aizawa, Toshimi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [5] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY GUIDED CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION OF THE SACROILIAC JOINT IN SPONDYLARTHROPATHY PATIENTS WITH SACROILITIS - FOLLOW-UP BY DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    BRAUN, J
    BOLLOW, M
    SEYREKBASAN, F
    HABERLE, HJ
    EGGENS, U
    MERTZ, A
    DISTLER, A
    SIEPER, J
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (09): : 1175 - 1175
  • [6] Computed Axial Tomography-Guided Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint Disruption: Safety, Outcomes, and Results at 3-Year Follow-Up
    Amoretti, Nicolas
    Hovorka, Istvan
    Marcy, Pierre-Yves
    Hauger, Olivier
    Amoretti, Marie-Eve
    Lesbats, Virginie
    Brunner, Philippe
    Maratos, Yvonne
    Stedman, Susan
    Boileau, Pascal
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (06) : 1227 - 1234
  • [7] Computed tomography guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joint in patients with spondyloarthropathy with sacroiliitis: Clinical outcome and followup by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging
    Braun, J
    Bollow, M
    Seyrekbasan, F
    Haberle, HJ
    Eggens, U
    Mertz, A
    Distler, A
    Sieper, J
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1996, 23 (04) : 659 - 664
  • [8] Computed Axial Tomography-Guided Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint Disruption: Safety, Outcomes, and Results at 3-Year Follow-Up
    Nicolas Amoretti
    Istvan Hovorka
    Pierre-Yves Marcy
    Olivier Hauger
    Marie-Eve Amoretti
    Virginie Lesbats
    Philippe Brunner
    Yvonne Maratos
    Susan Stedman
    Pascal Boileau
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009, 32 : 1227 - 1234
  • [9] Prospective Study of Clinical Outcome of Closed Subtalar Joint Dislocation, Two Years Follow-Up
    Krishnaprasad, P. R.
    Acharya, Kiran V.
    Rao, Y. Lakshmisha
    Murlimanju, B. V.
    Madi, Sandesh
    Bajrang, Tatia Darshan
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (01): : 135 - 144
  • [10] Risk Factors of Postoperative Sacroiliac Joint Pain for Posterior Lumbar Surgery: ≥2-Year Follow-up Retrospective Study
    Guan, Fulin
    Sun, Yang
    Zhu, Lin
    Guan, Guofa
    Chen, Ming
    Chi, Zhiyong
    Tian, Di
    Gu, Jiaao
    Yu, Zhange
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 110 : E546 - E551