Comparing mineral and fossil surplus costs of renewable and non-renewable electricity production

被引:4
|
作者
Vieira, Marisa D. M. [1 ,2 ]
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Environm Sci, Fac Sci, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] PRe Consultants Bv, Stn Pl 121, NL-3818 LE Amersfoort, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Electricity production; Fossil fuels; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Metals; Mineral resources; Scarcity; Surplus cost potential (SCP); LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RESOURCE DEPLETION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENT; PRICES; GROWTH; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-017-1335-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment aims to assess trade-offs between different impacts, including mineral and fossil resource use. The goals of this study were (1) to derive surplus cost potentials (SCPs) for a large number of fossil and mineral resources and (2) to derive surplus costs per megawatt hour of electricity produced for a range of both renewable and non-renewable technologies. The SCP of a resource refers to the total cost increase over the full amount of resource expected to be extracted in the future, expressed as US dollar (USD) per unit of resource extracted. For the fossil resources oil, natural gas and hard coal, cost-cumulative production relationships were derived that were subsequently used as input to calculate SCPs for these three fossil resources. For mineral resources, SCPs were readily available for 12 resources and platinum-group metals as a separate group. SCPs for an additional number of 57 mineral resources and 4 mineral resource groups were derived on the basis of a statistical relationship between SCP and average price in year 2013. The SCPs of fossil and mineral resources were subsequently used to derive the surplus costs per megawatt hour of 10 electricity production technologies. The surplus costs of electricity production ranged from 0.3 to 148 USD2013/MWh. The three fossil-based energy production technologies, based on coal, gas and oil, resulted in the highest overall surplus costs (23 to 148 USD2013/MWh), while nuclear, geothermal, photovoltaic, wind and hydropower technologies have the lowest surplus costs (0.3-6 USD2013/MWh). We found that the contribution of fossil resource use to the surplus costs was higher compared to mineral resource use, including the renewable energy technologies. Surplus costs of fossil and mineral resources can be used to compare renewable and non-renewable electricity production technologies. This case study shows that fossil fuel use drives the surplus costs of all energy technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 850
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing mineral and fossil surplus costs of renewable and non-renewable electricity production
    Marisa D. M. Vieira
    Mark A. J. Huijbregts
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 840 - 850
  • [2] Comparing the generation of electricity from renewable and non-renewable energy sources in Iran and the world: now and future
    Mohsen, Mirhabibi
    Bagher, Askari Mohammad
    Reza, Bahrampour Mohammad
    Vahid, Mirzaei Mahmoud Abadi
    Mahdi, Tikdari
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2015, 12 (06) : 627 - 638
  • [3] Conditional capital surplus and shortfall across renewable and non-renewable resource firms
    Irawan, Denny
    Okimoto, Tatsuyoshi
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 112
  • [4] Renewable versus non-renewable: The role of electricity generation to economic growth
    Jeon, Hwayoung
    [J]. Electricity Journal, 2022, 35 (06):
  • [5] RENEWABLE AND NON-RENEWABLE RESOURCES
    ABELSON, PH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1976, 191 (4228) : 631 - 631
  • [6] Effects of foreign aid and energy aid inflows on renewable and non-renewable electricity production in BRICS countries
    Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq
    Mahalik, Mantu Kumar
    Patel, Gupteswar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (03) : 7236 - 7255
  • [7] Effects of foreign aid and energy aid inflows on renewable and non-renewable electricity production in BRICS countries
    Muhammed Ashiq Villanthenkodath
    Mantu Kumar Mahalik
    Gupteswar Patel
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 7236 - 7255
  • [8] The Electricity Consumption-Growth Nexus: Renewable Versus Non-Renewable Electricity in Central America
    Apergis, N.
    Payne, J. E.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (04) : 423 - 431
  • [9] Energy Ratio analysis and accounting for renewable and non-renewable electricity generation: A review
    Walmsley, Timothy G.
    Walmsley, Michael R. W.
    Varbanov, Petar S.
    Klemes, Jiri J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 : 328 - 345
  • [10] CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy
    Cerdeira Bento, Joao Paulo
    Moutinho, Victor
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 : 142 - 155