Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages

被引:127
|
作者
Choi, JY [1 ]
Sung, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] 21st Century Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul 137070, South Korea
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); cage; subsidence;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The authors conducted a study to determine at what stage after surgery the subsidence occurred, and to assess the relationships of radiographic fusion and the recurrence of symptoms with the development of subsidence. Ninety patients underwent a single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using paired stand-alone rectangular cages between November 2000 and June 2002. All patients had regular clinical or imaging follow-up for a minimum of 19 months (range 19 - 38 months, mean = 27 months). The ratio of male to female patients was 1:3.1. The patients' ages at the time of ALIF ranged from 25 to 72 years, with a mean of 53 years. The preoperative and postoperative intervertebral disc heights were serially measured by plain radiographs. The location of cage subsidence into the vertebral body and times until the presence of subsidence were also assessed. The mean preoperative intervertebral disc height was 11.6 +/- 3.1 mm, which spread immediately after surgery to 16.9 +/- 2.0 mm. This increase was statistically significant (P = 0.001). At the last follow-up visit, the mean intervertebral disc height had been reduced to 13.2 +/- 2.4 mm. Sixty-nine of 90 patients (76.7%) developed cage subsidence into the surrounding vertebral body. Subsidence was more often noted in the superior endplate above the cage with regard to the location of cage subsidence [ superior endplate: 27 patients (39.1%), inferior endplate: 12 patients (17.3%), both: 30 patients (43.6%)]. The onset of subsidence varied from 0.25 to 8 months after surgery (median, 2.75 months). The 8-, 12-, and 16-week actuarial rates for developing cage subsidence were 38.9, 63.4, and 70.7%, respectively, when using the Kaplan-Meier method. There was no statistical correlation between the recurrence of symptoms (P = 0.3952) and radiographic fusion (P = 0.9518) with the log-rank test in development of subsidence. This study demonstrates that cage subsidence is an expected occurrence after ALIF using stand-alone rectangular cages. The 3- and 4-month actuarial rates for developing cage subsidence were 63.4 and 70.7%, respectively, and cage subsidence had no correlation with recurrence of symptoms and radiographic fusion in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages
    Jae Young Choi
    Kyeong Hoon Sung
    European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 16 - 22
  • [2] Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
    Gercek, E
    Arlet, V
    Delisle, J
    Marchesi, D
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (05) : 513 - 516
  • [3] Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
    Erol Gercek
    Vincent Arlet
    Josee Delisle
    Dante Marchesi
    European Spine Journal, 2003, 12 : 513 - 516
  • [4] Incidence and impact of implant subsidence after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Bocahut, N.
    Audureau, E.
    Poignard, A.
    Delambre, J.
    Queinnecc, S.
    Lachaniette, C. -H. Flouzat
    Allain, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [5] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [6] Subsidence and Nonunion after Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage
    Yang, Jae Jun
    Yu, Chang Hun
    Chang, Bong-Soon
    Yeom, Jin Sup
    Lee, Jae Hyup
    Lee, Choon-Ki
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2011, 3 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [7] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [8] Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs
    Bozzio, Anthony E.
    Johnson, Christopher R.
    Fattor, Jill A.
    Kleck, Christopher J.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Burger, Evalina L.
    Noshchenko, Andriy
    Cain, Christopher M. J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (05) : E655 - E662
  • [9] The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Manzur, Mustfa
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07): : 1294 - 1301
  • [10] Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Ghent, Finn
    Phan, Kevin
    Lee, Keegan
    Reddy, Rajesh
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (10) : 1619 - 1624