Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke

被引:22
|
作者
Barth, Jessica [1 ]
Geed, Shashwati [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Abigail [1 ]
Lum, Peter S. [3 ]
Edwards, Dorothy F. [4 ]
Dromerick, Alexander W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Natl Rehabil Network, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Catholic Univ Amer, Dept Biomed Engn, Washington, DC 20064 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Kinesiol & Occupat Therapy, Madison, WI USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
UPPER-LIMB RECOVERY; ARM ACTIVITY; ACCELERATION METRICS; CORTICAL INFARCTS; SUBACUTE STROKE; REHABILITATION; ACCELEROMETRY; COMPENSATION; NONUSE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0221668
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Animal models of brain recovery identify the first days after lesioning as a time of great flux in sensorimotor function and physiology. After rodent motor system lesioning, daily skill training in the less affected forelimb reduces skill acquisition in the more affected forelimb. We asked whether spontaneous human motor behaviors of the less affected upper extremity (UE) early after stroke resemble the animal training model, with the potential to suppress clinical recovery. Methods This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of patients (n = 25, mean 4.5 +/- 1.8) days after stroke with a wide severity range; Controls were hospitalized for non-neurological conditions (n = 12). Outcome measures were Accelerometry, Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Shoulder Abduction/ Finger Extension Test (SAFE), NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Results Accelerometry indicated total paretic UE movement was reduced compared to controls, primarily due to a 44% reduction of bilateral UE use. Unilateral paretic movement was unchanged. Thus, movement shifted early after stroke; bilateral use was reduced and unilateral use of the non-paretic UE was increased by 77%. Low correlations between movement time and motor performance prompted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealing a 2-component solution; motor performance tests load on one component (motor performance) whereas accelerometry-derived variables load on a second orthogonal component (quantity of movement). Conclusions Early after stroke, spontaneous overall UE movement is reduced, and movement shifts to unilateral use of the non-paretic UE. Two mechanisms that could influence motor recovery may already be in place 4.5 +/- 1.8 days post stroke: (1) the overuse of the less affected UE, which could set the stage for learned non-use and (2) skill acquisition in the non-paretic limb that could impede recovery. Accurate UE motor assessment requires two independent constructs: motor performance and quantity of movement. These findings provide opportunities and measurement methods for studies to develop new behaviorally-based stroke recovery treatments that begin early after onset.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RECOVERY OF IMPAIRED MOTOR FUNCTION OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY AFTER STROKE
    NAKAMURA, R
    MORIYAMA, S
    YAMADA, Y
    SEKI, K
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1992, 168 (01): : 11 - 20
  • [2] Predicting Upper Extremity Motor Impairments after Stroke: A Lesion Analysis
    Sonja, Findlater
    Jennifer, Semrau
    Jeffrey, Kenzie
    Amy, Yu Y. X.
    Troy, Herter
    Stephen, Scott
    Sean, Dukelow
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2017, 12 : 54 - 54
  • [3] Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after stroke
    Pohl, PS
    Winstein, CJ
    OnlaOr, S
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 1997, 9 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [4] Effectivity of Functional Electrostimulation in restoring Motor Function in the Upper Extremity after Stroke
    Kiukucane, Evita
    Stirane, Dace
    Tanenberga, Inga
    Vetra, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 : S74 - S74
  • [5] Serial functional magnetic resonance imaging of upper extremity motor function after stroke
    Greenberg, JP
    Williams, CB
    Wittenberg, GF
    Bastings, EP
    Scales, JC
    Yen, YF
    Pons, TP
    Good, DC
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (07) : A30 - A30
  • [6] The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke
    Morris, DM
    Uswatte, G
    Crago, JE
    Cook, EW
    Taub, E
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (06): : 750 - 755
  • [7] Upper Extremity Motor Impairment After Ischemic Stroke - Implications for Stem Cell Therapy
    Delavaran, Hossein
    Aked, Joseph
    Arvidsson, Andreas
    Lindvall, Olle
    Kokaia, Zaal
    Norrving, Bo
    Lindgren, Arne
    STROKE, 2016, 47
  • [8] Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke
    Beebe, Justin A.
    Lang, Catherine E.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (09) : 2074 - 2085
  • [9] MIRROR THERAPY FOR IMPROVING UPPER EXTREMITY MOTOR CONTROL AFTER STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Obembe, A.
    Robinson, T.
    Sinclair, A.
    Kraenow, S.
    Blazek, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (03) : 252 - 253
  • [10] Effect of Thermal Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery 3 Months After Stroke
    Wu, Hung-Chia
    Lin, Yu-Ching
    Hsu, Miao-Ju
    Liu, Shin-Mei
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    Lin, Jau-Hong
    STROKE, 2010, 41 (10) : 2378 - 2380