Surgical and Patient Outcomes Using Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:33
|
作者
Won, HaRyun
Maley, Peta
Salim, Stephanie
Rao, Archana
Campbell, Neil T.
Abbott, Jason A.
机构
[1] Royal Hosp Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2013年 / 121卷 / 03期
关键词
ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY; ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION; INTRAVENOUS FLUID; LAVAGE; COLON; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318282ed92
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Mechanical bowel preparation is a common practice before laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. This study aims to evaluate its capacity to improve surgical view and bowel handling in the deep pelvis. METHODS: A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken with laparoscopic gynecologic surgical patients assigned to one of the following three groups: fasting only; minimal residue diet for 2 days; or minimal residue diet for 2 days plus mechanical bowel preparation with oral sodium picosulphate. Outcomes included intraoperative surgical view and bowel handling, preoperative patient symptomatology, hematologic and biochemical characteristics, and bowel function. RESULTS: Three hundred eight participants were randomized. The intraoperative surgical view and bowel handling was minimally but statistically better in the minimal residue plus mechanical bowel preparation group compared with the other groups with less than a 1-point difference on a 10-point visual analog scale (P<.01 and P<.04, respectively). Women were assessed at baseline and on the day of surgery for the difference in visual analog scale score in the fasting only, minimal residue diet, and minimal residue diet with mechanical bowel preparation groups for headache (2.2 compared with 10.5 compared with 21; P<.01), thirst (14.7 compared with 24.7 compared with 30.9; P<.01), weakness (-0.2 compared with 16.6 compared with 25; P<.01), tiredness (-4.5 compared with 8.1 compared with 15.4; P<.01), anxiety (12.5 compared with 10.1 compared with 10.3; P=.66), and discomfort (-8.2 compared with 8.7 compared with 6.6; P<.01), respectively. Hematologic parameters were not different among the groups, and there was no significant difference in bowel function between the groups. CONCLUSION: Minimal residue diet plus mechanical bowel preparation provides statistical improvement in surgical view and bowel handling, but the benefit is likely of little clinical significance given overall blinded ratings from surgeons. Given the significant symptoms and discomfort caused for patients undertaking minimal residue diet with or without mechanical bowel preparation, fasting only without any preoperative diet or bowel preparation is a preferable alternative for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery involving the posterior pelvic compartment.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 546
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical and Patient Outcomes Using Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Won, HaRyun
    Maley, Peta
    Salim, Stephanie
    Rao, Archana
    Campbell, Neil T.
    Abbott, Jason A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2013, 68 (09) : 625 - 627
  • [2] The Effect of Mechanical Bowel Preparation on the Surgical Field in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ozturk, Ugur Kemal
    Acar, Sami
    Akis, Serkan
    Keles, Esra
    Alinca, Cihat Murat
    Api, Murat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (07) : 1604 - 1608
  • [3] Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Siedhoff, Matthew T.
    Clark, Leslie H.
    Hobbs, Kumari A.
    Findley, Austin D.
    Moulder, Janelle K.
    Garrett, Joanne M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (03): : 562 - 567
  • [4] Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial
    Muzii, L
    Bellati, F
    Zullo, MA
    Manci, N
    Angioli, R
    Panici, PB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (03) : 689 - 693
  • [5] Do We Need Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Benign Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgeries? A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial
    Mulayim, Baris
    Karadag, Burak
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2018, 83 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [6] Bowel Preparation Before Vaginal Prolapse Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ballard, Alicia C.
    Parker-Autry, Candace Y.
    Markland, Alayne D.
    Varner, R. Edward
    Huisingh, Carrie
    Richter, Holly E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (02): : 232 - 238
  • [7] Establishment of an optimum bowel preparation method before gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
    Sekine, Y
    Takai, Y
    Nishii, O
    Kudaka, N
    Onozawa, A
    Kizu, J
    Arakawa, Y
    Tsutsumi, O
    [J]. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2001, 121 (08): : 637 - 645
  • [8] The use of mechanical bowel preparation in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a decision analysis
    Kantartzis, Kelly L.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (05)
  • [9] Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopic procedures: Is it time to abandon this practice?
    Kathopoulis, Nikolaos
    Chatzipapas, Ioannis
    Valsamidis, Dimitrios
    Samartzis, Konstantinos
    Kipriotis, Konstantinos
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    Protopapas, Athanasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (04) : 1487 - 1496
  • [10] The Use of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Adelowo, Amos O.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Apostolis, Costa A.
    Disciullo, Anthony J.
    Hanaway, Katherine J.
    Elkadry, Emane E.
    Rosenblatt, Peter L.
    Rogers, Kathleen J.
    Hota, Lekha S.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (01): : 1 - 7