Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review

被引:42
|
作者
Chee, Brian [1 ]
Rickman, Luke J. [2 ]
Satterthwaite, Julian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Manchester M15 6FH, Lancs, England
[2] Antley Villa Dent Practice, Gen Dent Practitioner, Accrington BB5 0DE, Lancashire, England
关键词
Adhesives; Systematic review; Non-carious cervical lesions; Clinical effectiveness; 2-YEAR CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; SELF-ETCH ADHESIVE; RINSE ADHESIVES; COMPOSITE RESIN; DENTIN; DURABILITY; SURVIVAL; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To establish whether simplified adhesives (self-etch) are as clinically effective as conventional adhesives (etch-and-rinse) with multiple application steps for treatment of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the clinical effectiveness of the four different bonding strategies: Three-step etch-and-rinse; Two-step etch-and-rinse; Two-step self-etch; One-step self-etch for treatment of NCCLs. Sources: Electronic databases were searched including: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. In addition, studies were identified by handsearching of selected journals. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), with at least 18 months follow-up were selected. The primary outcome was loss of retention/restoration loss, with marginal adaptation and marginal discolouration as secondary outcomes. Criteria for quality assessment included: random sequence generation; allocation concealment; blinding of outcome assessment; and information on withdrawals. Twenty six studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. In general, studies were not of sufficient quality to fully address the objectives of this review. Conclusion: There is not enough evidence to support one adhesive or bonding strategy over another for treatment of NCCLs. Consequently, the null hypothesis of no difference cannot be supported or rejected with the data currently available. There is a need for better standardisation and reporting of randomised controlled trials investigating adhesive performance. Clinical significance: Studies with low overall risk of bias demonstrated good clinical performance for adhesives with all four bonding strategies. However, included studies showed wide variation between adhesives of the same category. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review
    Peumans, M.
    De Munck, J.
    Mine, A.
    Van Meerbeek, B.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (10) : 1089 - 1103
  • [2] Universal adhesives and non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Josic, Uros
    Mazzitelli, Claudia
    Maravic, Tatjana
    Ragazzini, Nicola
    Jacimovic, Jelena
    Mancuso, Edoardo
    Mazzoni, Annalisa
    Breschi, Lorenzo
    [J]. DENTAL CADMOS, 2022, 90 (03) : 188 - 197
  • [3] Root coverage with the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chawla, Kirti
    Goyal, Lata
    [J]. DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2024, 61 (01) : 99 - 119
  • [4] Non-carious cervical lesions and occlusion: a systematic review of clinical studies
    Senna, P.
    Del Bel Cury, A.
    Roesing, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 39 (06) : 450 - 462
  • [5] Morphological characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review
    Villamayor, Karen Gisselle Garay
    Codas-Duarte, Diana
    Ramirez, Iago
    Souza-Gabriel, Aline Evangelista
    Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao
    Candemil, Amanda Pelegrin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 167
  • [6] Non-carious cervical lesions
    不详
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2003, 28 (02) : 109 - 113
  • [7] The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions
    Walter, C.
    Kress, E.
    Goetz, H.
    Taylor, K.
    Willershausen, I.
    Zampelis, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 18 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [8] GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE RESTORATION OF NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS
    Francisconi, Luciana Favaro
    Candia Scaffa, Polliana Mendes
    dos Santos Paes de Barros, Vivian Rosa
    Coutinho, Margareth
    Silveira Francisconi, Paulo Afonso
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2009, 17 (05) : 364 - 369
  • [9] Diagnosis of non-carious cervical lesions
    Asra Sabir Hussain
    Rehab Melibari
    Meteib Joraib Al Toubity
    Mujahed Sami Sultan
    Abdulrahman Alnahhas
    [J]. Clinical Dentistry Reviewed, 5 (1):
  • [10] The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions
    C. Walter
    E. Kress
    H. Götz
    K. Taylor
    I. Willershausen
    A. Zampelis
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2014, 18 : 139 - 146