Evaluating the Return in Ecosystem Services from Investment in Public Land Acquisitions

被引:38
|
作者
Kovacs, Kent [1 ]
Polasky, Stephen [2 ]
Nelson, Erik [3 ]
Keeler, Bonnie L. [4 ]
Pennington, Derric [5 ]
Plantinga, Andrew J. [6 ]
Taff, Steven J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Bowdoin Coll, Dept Econ, Brunswick, ME 04011 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[5] World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[6] Oregon State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; MAXIMIZING RETURN; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; UNITED-STATES; PHOSPHORUS; EFFICIENCY; INVENTORY; POLLUTION; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0062202
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We evaluate the return on investment (ROI) from public land conservation in the state of Minnesota, USA. We use a spatially-explicit modeling tool, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to estimate how changes in land use and land cover (LULC), including public land acquisitions for conservation, influence the joint provision and value of multiple ecosystem services. We calculate the ROI of a public conservation acquisition as the ratio of the present value of ecosystem services generated by the conservation to the cost of the conservation. For the land scenarios analyzed, carbon sequestration services generated the greatest benefits followed by water quality improvements and recreation opportunities. We found ROI values ranged from 0.21 to 5.28 depending on assumptions about future land use change, service values, and discount rate. Our study suggests conservation is a good investment as long as investments are targeted to areas with low land costs and high service values.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reforestation and sylvopastoral systems in Sahelian drylands: evaluating return on investment from provisioning ecosystem services, Senegal
    Cesaro, Jean-Daniel
    Mbaye, Tamsir
    Ba, Baba
    Ba, Marieme Fall
    Delaye, Etienne
    Akodewou, Amah
    Taugourdeau, Simon
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [2] A comparative method for evaluating ecosystem services from the viewpoint of public works
    Okada, Tomonari
    Mito, Yugo
    Tokunaga, Kanae
    Sugino, Hiroaki
    Kubo, Takahiro
    Akiyama, Yoshihiro B.
    Endo, Toru
    Otani, Sosuke
    Yamochi, Susumu
    Kozuki, Yasunori
    Kusakabe, Takayuki
    Otsuka, Koji
    Yamanaka, Ryoichi
    Shigematsu, Takaaki
    Kuwae, Tomohiro
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 212
  • [3] Evaluating Ecosystem Services for the Expansion of Irrigation on Agricultural Land
    Estes Jr, Maurice G. G.
    Cruise, James
    Ellenburg, Walter Lee
    Suhs, Rachel
    Cox, Alexandria
    Runge, Max
    Newby, Adam
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [4] Evaluating opportunities to enhance ecosystem services in public use areas
    Villamagna, Amy M.
    Angermeier, Paul L.
    Niazi, Nicholas
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 : 167 - 176
  • [5] Capturing the social value and return on investment of public health services and interventions
    Ashton, K.
    Stielke, A.
    Dyakova, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [6] Return on Investment from Training Programs and Intensive Services
    Fleissig A.R.
    [J]. Atlantic Economic Journal, 2014, 42 (1) : 39 - 51
  • [7] PLANNING PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS IN VIEW OF RETURN OF INVESTMENT CREDIT
    ALKIRE, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1967, 27 (02): : 66 - 69
  • [8] Library value (return on investment, ROI) and the challenge of placing a value on public services
    Kaufman, Paula
    Watstein, Sarah Barbara
    [J]. REFERENCE SERVICES REVIEW, 2008, 36 (03) : 226 - +
  • [9] Characterizing and evaluating the impacts of national land restoration initiatives on ecosystem services in Ethiopia
    Abera, Wuletawu
    Tamene, Lulseged
    Tibebe, Degefie
    Adimassu, Zenebe
    Kassa, Habtemariam
    Hailu, Habtamu
    Mekonnen, Kindu
    Desta, Gizaw
    Sommer, Rolf
    Verchot, Louis
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 31 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [10] Revisiting production and ecosystem services on the farm scale for evaluating land use alternatives
    Lerouge, Frederik
    Sannen, Kurt
    Gulinck, Hubert
    Vranken, Liesbet
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 57 : 50 - 59