Too Big To Fail?: The Transatlantic Relationship from Bush to Obama

被引:3
|
作者
Cox, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, IDEAS, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Int Relat, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
COLD-WAR; HISTORY; POWER; END;
D O I
10.1111/1758-5899.12011
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
On September 11 2011 the world commemorated the tenth anniversary of one of the great tipping points in recent international affairs: the successful attacks launched by Al-Qaeda on the USA. In this article, I reflect on only one aspect of the global fallout: the impact which the ensuing war on terror' had on the transatlantic relationship. Here scholars have divided into broadly two camps, one of which insists that the war' did very little to shake the foundations of what remains a remarkably stable relationship, and another which argues that the first decade of the 21st century effectively witnessed the death of the West. Both views as I will argue are exaggerated. Yet, as I will also show, the relationship was clearly weakened by the fallout from 9/11. This in large part explains why Barack Obama's election in 2008 was greeted with such enthusiasm in European capitals. Yet even his election has not dispelled worries about the long-term health of the relationship. Indeed, with the rise of China and the USA's apparent tilt towards an economically more dynamic Asia, Europe it seems has become less important to the USA and the USA seemingly less interested in Europe. The relationship thus still faces some very real challenges in the years ahead challenges that will test the intelligence and capacities of policy-makers on both sides of the Atlantic. Policy Implications center dot The transatlantic relationship has remained central to world order and it is critically important that policy-makers in Europe and the United States continue to recognize this. center dot Policy elites should draw the right lessons from the transatlantic crisis caused by the Iraq war in 2003 and try to ensure that such a rift does not occur again. center dot US policy-makers in their efforts to build new relationships with emerging powers in Asia should be careful not to convey the impression to their European allies that their new interest in Asia and China is the same thing as indifference towards Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Too big to succeed or too big to fail?
    Fishman, Arthur
    Don-Yehiya, Hadas
    Schreiber, Amnon
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2018, 51 (04) : 811 - 822
  • [2] Too big to succeed or too big to fail?
    Arthur Fishman
    Hadas Don-Yehiya
    Amnon Schreiber
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2018, 51 : 811 - 822
  • [3] Too Big to Fail?
    Lynskey, Gerard
    [J]. 2016 IEEE-IAS/PCA CEMENT INDUSTRY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 2016,
  • [4] TOO BIG TO FAIL
    Dunn, Sarah
    Felsen, Martin
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2012, 82 (05) : 114 - 119
  • [5] TOO BIG TO FAIL
    Schuler, Timothy A.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE, 2021, 111 (09) : 26 - +
  • [6] Too big to fail?
    Stanek, William Robert
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2013, 138 (16) : 12 - 12
  • [7] Resolving "Too Big to Fail"
    Cetorelli, Nicola
    Traina, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 60 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [8] Resolving “Too Big to Fail”
    Nicola Cetorelli
    James Traina
    [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2021, 60 : 1 - 23
  • [9] Environment Too Big to Fail
    Schnoor, Jerald L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (09) : 3202 - 3202
  • [10] HDL—is it too big to fail?
    Dominic S. Ng
    Norman C. W. Wong
    Robert A. Hegele
    [J]. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2013, 9 : 308 - 312