What Are the Pragmatics of Explanation?

被引:0
|
作者
Carroll, John W. [1 ]
机构
[1] NC State Univ, Dept Philosophy & Religious Studies, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Explanation; Relevance; Contrastivity; Context; Presupposition; CAUSAL; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s10838-019-09492-4
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
An enticing view about explanation consists of two theses. First, there is theRelevance Thesis, the thesis that the truth of explanation sentences depends on a contextually selected relevance relation. The idea is that whether an utterance is true depends on what factors the context counts as relevant. Second, there is theContrastivity Thesis, the thesis that the truth of explanation sentences depends on a contextually determined contrastive focus. This metalinguistic viewisenticing, and elements of it have been defended by van Fraassen (1980), Woodward (1984), Schaffer (2005a;2013), and others. Nevertheless, the enticing view is flawed; both the Contrastivity Thesis and the Relevance Thesis are mistaken.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 357
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条