A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program

被引:17
|
作者
Rosen, Laura [1 ]
Rosenberg, Elliot [2 ]
McKee, Martin [3 ]
Gan-Noy, Shosh [4 ]
Levin, Diane [4 ]
Mayshar, Elana [5 ]
Shacham, Galia [6 ]
Borowski, John [7 ]
Bin Nun, Gabi [8 ]
Lev, Boaz [9 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, Sch Publ Hlth, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Israel Minist Hlth, Healthy Israel Initiat 2020, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, European Ctr Hlth Soc Transit, London WC1E 7HT, England
[4] Clalit Hlth Serv, Dept Hlth Educ & Promot, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Israel Minist Hlth, Legal Dept, Jerusalem, Israel
[6] Israel Minist Educ, Psychol Consulting Serv Dept, Jerusalem, Israel
[7] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Emergency Dept, IL-91031 Jerusalem, Israel
[8] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Sch Management, Dept Hlth Syst Management, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[9] Israel Minist Hlth, Off Associate Director, Jerusalem, Israel
来源
关键词
Tobacco Control; Smokeless Tobacco; Preventive Service Task; Tobacco Industry; Secondhand Smoke;
D O I
10.1186/1478-4505-8-17
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tobacco control is an area where the translation of evidence into policy would seem to be straightforward, given the wealth of epidemiological, behavioural and other types of research available. Yet, even here challenges exist. These include information overload, concealment of key (industry-funded) evidence, contextualization, assessment of population impact, and the changing nature of the threat. Methods: In the context of Israel's health targeting initiative, Healthy Israel 2020, we describe the steps taken to develop a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. We elaborate on the following: a) scientific issues influencing the choice of tobacco control strategies; b) organization of existing evidence of effectiveness of interventions into a manageable form, and c) consideration of relevant philosophical and political issues. We propose a framework for developing a plan and illustrate this process with a case study in Israel. Results: Broad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies. Scientific challenges include integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources, and lack of estimates of population impact of interventions. Philosophical and political challenges include the use of evidence-based versus innovative policymaking, the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility, and whether and how interventions should be prioritized. The proposed framework includes: 1) compilation of a list of potential interventions 2) modification of that list based on local needs and political constraints; 3) streamlining the list by categorizing interventions into broad groupings of related interventions; together these groupings form the basis of a comprehensive plan; and 4) refinement of the plan by comparing it to existing comprehensive plans. Conclusions: Development of a comprehensive tobacco control plan is a complex endeavour, involving crucial decisions regarding intervention components. "Off the shelf" plans, which need to be adapted to local settings, are available from a variety of sources, and a multitude of individual recommendations are available. The proposed framework for adapting existing approaches to the local social and political climate may assist others planning for smoke-free societies. Additionally, this experience has implications for development of evidence-based health plans addressing other risk factors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program
    Laura Rosen
    Elliot Rosenberg
    Martin McKee
    Shosh Gan-Noy
    Diane Levin
    Elana Mayshar
    Galia Shacham
    John Borowski
    Gabi Bin Nun
    Boaz Lev
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8
  • [2] Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation
    Guzelian, PS
    Victoroff, MS
    Halmes, NC
    James, RC
    Guzelian, CP
    [J]. HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 24 (04) : 161 - 201
  • [3] Developing an Evidence-Based Practice Fellowship Program
    Selig, Patricia M.
    Estes, Tracy S.
    Nease, Beth
    [J]. NEWBORN AND INFANT NURSING REVIEWS, 2009, 9 (02) : 99 - 101
  • [4] Developing an evidence-based ketogenic therapy program
    Little, LE
    Layman, MH
    Borum, PR
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (04): : A183 - A184
  • [5] DEVELOPING COMPREHENSIVE STROKE SERVICES - AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH
    LANGHORNE, P
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 71 (842) : 733 - 737
  • [6] Communicating Program Outcomes to Encourage Policymaker Support for Evidence-Based State Tobacco Control
    Schmidt, Allison M.
    Ranney, Leah M.
    Goldstein, Adam O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (12): : 12562 - 12574
  • [7] Developing an evidence-based transition program for graduate nurses
    Adams, Jillian Elizabeth
    Gillman, Lucia
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2016, 52 (05) : 511 - 521
  • [8] Developing an evidence-based approach to quality control
    Badrick, Tony
    Loh, Tze Ping
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 114 : 39 - 42
  • [9] THE EVIDENCE PROJECT: A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVIDENCE-BASED DECISION-MAKING
    Ruddy, R. W.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 16 : A184 - A185
  • [10] A Framework for Maintenance and Scaling of an Evidence-based Guideline Program
    Seneski, Annie
    Stack, Anne M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 4 (02)