Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices

被引:3
|
作者
Ma, Jing [1 ]
Yin, Zhaoyun [1 ]
Guo, Zhengbing [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, 28 Xianning Rd West, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
关键词
meta-evaluation; evaluation of environmental management; standard; criteria; urban sewage treatment; national key ecological function areas;
D O I
10.3390/su13052567
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental management plays a key role in the sustainable development of cities. The effectiveness of environmental management is commonly examined through some evaluation schemes, but the effectiveness of such evaluation schemes also needs to be verified. As such, in this study, meta-evaluation was creatively introduced into environmental management to improve the evaluation of environmental management (EEM). Meta-evaluation is the evaluation of an evaluation scheme, and can verify and enhance the evaluation quality. First, a set of new meta-evaluation standards and criteria was proposed based on the unique characteristics of environmental management, which made meta-evaluation standards more adaptable and effective. After that, the efficacy of the proposed meta-evaluation standards was verified through their application to two evaluation schemes used in different fields of EEM. Based on meta-evaluation, suggestions for improving these two EEM schemes were also provided. The major contributions of this study are to introduce meta-evaluation into environmental management, establish new evaluation standards, and examine the efficacy of EEM. The research showed that it is critical to carry out meta-evaluation before and/or after the implementation of EEM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations
    L. Georghiou
    [J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 45 : 523 - 530
  • [2] Meta-evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations
    Praestgaard, E
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 1999, 45 (03) : 531 - 532
  • [3] Meta-evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations
    E. Praestgaard
    [J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 45 : 531 - 532
  • [4] IMPROVING EVALUATION OF STUDENTS: A META-EVALUATION STUDY ON CCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF STUDENTS EVALUATION STANDARDS
    Samson, Binukumar
    Solabarrieta, Josu
    [J]. MIER-JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES TRENDS AND PRACTICES, 2018, 8 (02): : 131 - 146
  • [5] Development of a Meta-Evaluation Rubric and Meta-Evaluation of Initial Teacher Education Programs
    Burakgazi, Sevinc Gelmez
    Karsantik, Yasemin
    [J]. EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2024, 49 (217): : 225 - 248
  • [6] Meta-evaluation of a participatory process in the strengthening of municipal management
    Locatelli de Almeida, Cristiane Andrea
    Tanaka, Oswaldo Yoshimi
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2017, 51
  • [7] Improving the quality of evaluation participation: a meta-evaluation
    Russ-Eft, Darlene
    Preskill, Hallie
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 11 (01) : 35 - 50
  • [8] META-EVALUATION: EVALUATING THE EVALUATION OF THE PARIS DECLARATION
    Patton, Michael Quinn
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2012, 27 (03) : 147 - 171
  • [9] A Meta-Evaluation of Evaluation Methods for Diversified Search
    Kingrani, Suneel Kumar
    Levene, Mark
    Zhang, Dell
    [J]. ADVANCES IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (ECIR 2018), 2018, 10772 : 550 - 555
  • [10] Meta-evaluation of Conversational Search Evaluation Metrics
    Liu, Zeyang
    Zhou, Ke
    Wilson, Max L.
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 39 (04)