Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males

被引:22
|
作者
Collins, SA [1 ]
Luddem, ST [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Anim Behav & Ecol Grp, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
sexual dimorphism; reinforcement; female preference; estrildid finch;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2001.1864
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Several studies have shown female preference for conspecific males with the attached artificial ornaments of more elaborate heterospecifics. However, preference for heterospecifics under natural conditions is relatively rare. We tested what factors affect behavioural mechanisms of species isolation using three species of estrildid finch (genus Uraeginthus) that occur in both sympatry and allopatry. These finches differ in degree of sexual dimorphism; male ornamentation; behavioural and morphological similarity; and phylogenetic distance. Paired mate-choice trials were used in which females were presented with a conspecific and heterospecific male to test which of the above between-species differences best predicted the degree of premating isolation. The three species differed in the degree of species-specific mate preference shown. Females from the brighter two species discriminated against dull males, independently of sympatry-allopatry, similarity and phylogenetic distance. Females from the dull species reacted to conspecific males and brighter heterospecific males equally strongly, independently of similarity and phylogenetic distance. In contrast to previous studies, an equal preference for heterospecific and conspecific males was found under natural conditions. It is suggested that differences between closely related species in male ornamentation affect the likelihood that premating isolation will occur due to the fact that sexual selection tends to drive preferences for exaggerated ornamentation.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] No preference in female sika deer for conspecific over heterospecific male sexual calls in a mate choice context
    Wyman, M. T.
    Locatelli, Y.
    Charlton, B. D.
    Reby, D.
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2014, 293 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [2] Female predatory response to conspecific males and heterospecific prey in the praying mantis Mantis religiosa: evidence for discrimination of conspecific males
    Pavol Prokop
    Michael R. Maxwell
    Journal of Ethology, 2016, 34 : 139 - 146
  • [3] Female predatory response to conspecific males and heterospecific prey in the praying mantis Mantis religiosa: evidence for discrimination of conspecific males
    Prokop, Pavol
    Maxwell, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF ETHOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [4] Interactions with heterospecific males do not affect how female Mesocricetus hamsters respond to conspecific males
    delBarco-Trillo, Javier
    Johnston, Robert E.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 85 (01) : 151 - 155
  • [5] Predation Risk Reduces a Female Preference for Heterospecific Males in the Green Swordtail
    Pilakouta, Natalie
    Correa, Maria A.
    Alonzo, Suzanne H.
    ETHOLOGY, 2017, 123 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [6] Stimulatory effects on the reproductive axis in female songbirds by conspecific and heterospecific male song
    Bentley, GE
    Wingfield, JC
    Morton, ML
    Ball, GF
    HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 37 (03) : 179 - 189
  • [7] Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow
    Griggio, Matteo
    Devigili, Alessandro
    Hoi, Herbert
    Pilastro, Andrea
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 20 (05) : 1072 - 1078
  • [8] Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song
    Gentner, TQ
    Hulse, SH
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59 : 443 - 458
  • [9] Multiple Sexual Ornamentation Signals Male Quality and Predicts Female Preference in Minnows
    Kekalainen, Jukka
    Valkama, Hannele
    Huuskonen, Hannu
    Taskinen, Jouni
    ETHOLOGY, 2010, 116 (10) : 895 - 903
  • [10] Female preference for conspecific males based on olfactory cues in a Lake Malawi cichlid fish
    Plenderleith, M
    van Oosterhout, C
    Robinson, RL
    Turner, GF
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 1 (04) : 411 - 414