Evaluating Performance of Photographs for Marine Citizen Science Applications

被引:13
|
作者
Newcomer, Katherine [1 ]
Tracy, Brianna M. [1 ]
Chang, Andrew L. [2 ]
Ruiz, Gregory M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Marine Invas Lab, POB 28, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA
[2] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Marine Invas Lab, Tiburon, CA USA
关键词
photographic methods; marine; invertebrates; non-native; citizen science; taxonomy; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; FOULING COMMUNITY; ESTUARINE; PATTERNS; CALIFORNIA; HISTORY; SCIENTISTS; VALIDATION; STABILITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2019.00336
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Long-term measurements are imperative to detect, understand, and predict changes in coastal biological communities, but can be both costly and difficult to implement. Here, we compare measurement methods used to document community structure and assess changes in marine systems, and explore potential applications in citizen science. The use of photographs for species identifications and monitoring has become a popular and useful data collection tool, but its use requires evaluation of its effectiveness in comparison to data collected from live examinations. We used settlement panels in San Francisco Bay, a well-studied and vital coastal ecosystem, to compare standardized measures of the invertebrate fouling community through examination of live organisms in the field and via photographs. Overall, our study found that live measurements were more accurate and better represented these marine communities, having higher richness, and diversity measurements than photographic measurements. However, photographic analyses accurately captured the relative abundances of some species and functional groups. We suggest that highly recognizable target taxa or broad scale comparisons of functional group composition are easily tracked through photographs and offer the best potential for research conducted by citizen scientists.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recognizability bias in citizen science photographs
    Koch, Wouter
    Hogeweg, Laurens
    Nilsen, Erlend B.
    O'Hara, Robert B.
    Finstad, Anders G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [2] Perspectives in Marine Citizen Science
    Bear, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (01) : 56 - 59
  • [3] Making marine and coastal citizen science matter
    Cigliano, John A.
    Meyer, Ryan
    Ballard, Heidi L.
    Freitag, Amy
    Phillips, Tina B.
    Wasser, Ann
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 115 : 77 - 87
  • [4] Citizen science in marine litter research: A review
    Kawabe, L. A.
    Ghilardi-Lopes, N. P.
    Turra, A.
    Wyles, K. J.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 182
  • [5] Citizen science and marine conservation: a global review
    Kelly, Rachel
    Fleming, Aysha
    Pecl, Gretta T.
    von Gonner, Julia
    Bonn, Aletta
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 375 (1814)
  • [6] Evaluating Volunteers' Contributions in a Citizen Science Project
    Arcanjo, Jeferson S.
    Luz, Eduardo F. P.
    Fazenda, Alvaro L.
    Ramos, Fernando M.
    2014 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE (E-SCIENCE), VOL 1, 2014, : 21 - 28
  • [7] Science for the Future: The Use of Citizen Science in Marine Research and Conservation
    Earp, Hannah S.
    Liconti, Arianna
    YOUMARES 9 - THE OCEANS: OUR RESEARCH, OUR FUTURE, 2020, : 1 - 19
  • [8] Making Waves: Marine Citizen Science for Impact
    Schlappy, Marie-Lise
    Loder, Jennifer
    Salmond, Jodi
    Lea, Alexandra
    Dean, Angela J.
    Roelfsema, Chris M.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 4
  • [9] Using citizen science photographs to identify reproductive events in an oviparous elasmobranch
    Mawer, Rachel
    Dodd, Jane
    Thorburn, James
    Burns, Neil M.
    Bailey, David M.
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [10] Is color data from citizen science photographs reliable for biodiversity research?
    Laitly, Alexandra
    Callaghan, Corey T.
    Delhey, Kaspar
    Cornwell, William K.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (09): : 4071 - 4083