Optimization schemes for grassland ecosystem services under climate change

被引:17
|
作者
Hao, Ruifang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Deyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Coll Resources Sci & Technol,CHESS, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Arid and semiarid area; Tradeoff; Scenario simulation; Grazing intensity; Optimization; Sustainability; INNER-MONGOLIA; CHINA; MODEL; SENSITIVITY; BIOMASS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.012
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem and associated services in arid and semiarid areas are sensitive to climate change and human activities. Guiding human activities based on the optimization of ecosystem services can help humans adapt to climate change effectively, which is vital for regional sustainability. We evaluated the distribution of five ecosystem services: net primary productivity (NPP), soil conservation (SC), water yield (WY), water retention (WR), and livestock supply in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China (GAPTZ) under the future climate scenarios of representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP8.5 in 2050. We designed the four grazing-intensity scenarios of ungrazed (UG), lightly grazed (LG), moderately grazed (MG), and heavily grazed (HG) and analyzed the impacts of climate change and grazing on the ecosystem services. Finally, we presented the optimization schemes of grazing intensity in the GAPTZ under the objectives of "strong sustainability" and "weak sustainability". "Strong sustainability" objective means that the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal and should not be less than 0. "Weak sustainability" objective means that the livestock supply is preferential and the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal but could be less than 0. The results showed that both climate change and grazing exert great influence on the supply and interrelation of ecosystem services. In the northeast of the GAPTZ, LG and MG can stimulate grassland to tiller and enlarge ecosystem services integrally. HG has the severest negative effect on ecosystem services overall. Under the "weak sustainability" objective, LG can be widely adopted in the GAPTZ. Under the "strong sustainability" objective, grazing should be limited in the northwestern and north central GAPTZ. Reasonable planning of grazing intensity and its spatial patterns can promote effective utilization of grassland resource and realization of regional sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1169
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate change and ecosystem services
    Scholes, Robert J.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 7 (04) : 537 - 550
  • [2] Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services
    Mooney, Harold
    Larigauderie, Anne
    Cesario, Manuel
    Elmquist, Thomas
    Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Palmer, Margaret
    Scholes, Robert
    Yahara, Tetsukazu
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 1 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [3] Landscape Conservation Planning to Sustain Ecosystem Services under Climate Change
    Lin, Yu-Pin
    Chen, Chi-Ju
    Lien, Wan-Yu
    Chang, Wen-Hao
    Petway, Joy R.
    Chiang, Li-Chi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05):
  • [4] Management of Multiple Ecosystem Services under Climate Change, Bioeconomy and Participation
    Baskent, Emin Zeki
    Borges, Jose Guilherme
    Vacik, Harald
    Reynolds, Keith M.
    Rodriguez, Luiz Carlos E.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [5] An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change
    Lewis, David J.
    Polasky, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 92 : 20 - 34
  • [6] Invertebrates, ecosystem services and climate change
    Prather, Chelse M.
    Pelini, Shannon L.
    Laws, Angela
    Rivest, Emily
    Woltz, Megan
    Bloch, Christopher P.
    Del Toro, Israel
    Ho, Chuan-Kai
    Kominoski, John
    ScottNewbold, T. A.
    Parsons, Sheena
    Joern, A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 88 (02) : 327 - 348
  • [7] Decision Support for the Provision of Ecosystem Services under Climate Change: An Editorial
    Vacik, Harald
    Borges, Jose G.
    Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi
    Eriksson, Ljusk-Ola
    [J]. FORESTS, 2015, 6 (09): : 3212 - 3217
  • [8] Future Risk for Southern Ocean Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change
    Cavanagh, Rachel D.
    Melbourne-Thomas, Jess
    Grant, Susie M.
    Barnes, David K. A.
    Hughes, Kevin A.
    Halfter, Svenja
    Meredith, Michael P.
    Murphy, Eugene J.
    Trebilco, Rowan
    Hill, Simeon L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 7
  • [9] Response of a grassland ecosystem to climate change in a theoretical model
    Guodong Sun
    Mu Mu
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2011, 28 : 1266 - 1278
  • [10] Response of a Grassland Ecosystem to Climate Change in a Theoretical Model
    Sun Guodong
    Mu Mu
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2011, 28 (06) : 1266 - 1278