Stated Preferences Analysis Using Conjoint Analysis Method and Conjoint R Package

被引:0
|
作者
Bartlomowicz, Tomasz [1 ]
Bak, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Econ & Business, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
stated preferences; conjoint analysis; R program;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Two groups of research methods are used in the decompositional approach to stated preferences - conjoint analysis methods and discrete choice methods. The most commonly applied traditional conjoint analysis method is an example of the first group. Because of its computational complexity, practical application of conjoint analysis requires using appropriate commercial or non-commercial computer software. The purpose of the paper is to present the traditional conjoint analysis method and discuss its implementation in the form of conjoint package for R program, which with CRAN packages, is currently one of the most important non-commercial computing environments for statistical data analysis. In addition to the detailed characteristics of the individual conjoint R package functions, the paper also presents the application of conjoint package in marketing research with the interpretation of the selected results, based on the example of measuring and analyzing stated preferences of beer consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:12442 / 12457
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A conjoint analysis of stated vaccine preferences in Shanghai, China
    Sun, Xiaodong
    Wagner, Abram L.
    Ji, Jiahui
    Huang, Zhuoying
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Boulton, Matthew L.
    Ren, Jia
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2020, 38 (06) : 1520 - 1525
  • [2] The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis
    van Til, J. A.
    Stiggelbout, A. M.
    IJzerman, M. J.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 74 (02) : 264 - 271
  • [3] PREFERENCES MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION USING CONJOINT ANALYSIS
    Matei, Monica Mihaela Maer
    [J]. ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 1883 - 1888
  • [4] Using Conjoint Analysis to Evaluate Health State Preferences
    Sheryl L. Szeinbach
    James H. Barnes
    William F. McGhan
    Matthew M. Murawski
    Ron Corey
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1999, 33 (3): : 849 - 858
  • [5] CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR EGGS USING CONJOINT-ANALYSIS
    GERHARDY, H
    NESS, MR
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1995, 51 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [6] Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences
    Szeinbach, SL
    Barnes, JH
    McGhan, WF
    Murawski, MM
    Corey, R
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1999, 33 (03): : 849 - 858
  • [7] Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
    Ryan, M
    Farrar, S
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7248): : 1530 - 1533
  • [8] CONJOINT-ANALYSIS OF NEGOTIATOR PREFERENCES
    GREENHALGH, L
    NESLIN, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1981, 25 (02) : 301 - 327
  • [9] CONJOINT-ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES
    FINDIKAKITSAMOURTZI, I
    DAJANI, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION-ASCE, 1982, 108 (01): : 15 - 33
  • [10] Preferences for Training Options: A Conjoint Analysis
    Gan, Chui Goh
    Lee, Julie Anne
    Soutar, Geoffrey N.
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2009, 20 (03) : 307 - 330