Factors influencing variability in the infiltration of PM2.5 mass and its components

被引:81
|
作者
MacNeill, M. [1 ]
Wallace, L.
Kearney, J. [1 ]
Allen, R. W. [2 ]
Van Ryswyk, K. [1 ]
Judek, S. [1 ]
Xu, X. [3 ]
Wheeler, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Canada, Air Hlth Sci Div, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[3] Univ Windsor, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
关键词
Infiltration factor (F-inf); Ambient personal exposure factor (F-pex); PM2.5; Ultrafine particles (UFPs); Black carbon (BC); Ambient; Non-ambient; Indoor air pollution; Windsor; Ontario; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; OUTDOOR CONCENTRATIONS; INDOOR AIR; PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; VENTILATION SYSTEMS; COARSE PARTICLES; OCCUPIED HOUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The infiltration of particles into homes can vary seasonally, between homes in a community and between communities. However, few studies have examined the day to day variability across multiple homes. We used continuous data collected from a 2-year (2005-2006) personal exposure study conducted in Windsor, ON to estimate daily infiltration factors (F-inf) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), Black Carbon (BC), and ultrafine particles (UFP) as well as the ambient personal exposure factor (F-pex) for PM2.5. In addition, the daily ambient and non-ambient generated components of indoor and personal concentrations were estimated. Median daily F-inf estimates ranged from 0.26 to 0.36 across seasons for PM2.5: from 028 to 0.59 for BC; and from 0.15 to 0.26 for UFP. Median daily F-pex estimates ranged from 0.24 to 0.31 across seasons. Daily PM2.5 and UFP F-inf and F-pex estimates were higher in summer than winter, although BC showed the opposite trend. Predictors of daily infiltration were typically related to window-opening behaviours, air conditioning, meteorological variables, and home age. In addition, use of electrostatic precipitators and stand alone air cleaners was associated with significantly reduced infiltration factors, indicating that these devices may provide a cost effective mechanism of reducing human exposures to particles of ambient origin. The majority of indoor PM2.5 (median 57-73%) and indoor BC (median 90-100%) was of ambient origin across seasons, while both personal PM2.5 and indoor UFPs had significant non-ambient contributions (median 60-65%). Factors that were found to increase non-ambient particle concentrations were typically related to cooking, candle use, supplemental heating, cleaning, and number of people in the home. Factors that were found to decrease non-ambient particle concentrations were open windows, and air cleaner use. This work has several implications to both epidemiologic studies and risk management. A better understanding of the factors influencing F-inf and F-pex can improve exposure assessment and contribute to reduced exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies. Furthermore, by increasing our knowledge of non-ambient and ambient exposures, risk associated with PM exposure can be managed more effectively. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 532
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 and influencing factors
    Zahed, Fatemeh
    Pardakhti, Alireza
    Motlagh, Majid Shafiepour
    Kari, Behrouz Mohammad
    Tavakoli, Azadeh
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2022, 15 (12): : 2215 - 2230
  • [2] Infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 and influencing factors
    Fatemeh Zahed
    Alireza Pardakhti
    Majid Shafiepour Motlagh
    Behrouz Mohammad Kari
    Azadeh Tavakoli
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2022, 15 : 2215 - 2230
  • [3] The Factors Influencing PM2.5 Value
    Xu, Jiannan
    2017 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2017), VOL 2, 2017, 75 : 453 - 457
  • [4] Urban scale variability of PM2.5, components
    Stevens, C.
    Williams, R.
    Vette, A.
    Jones, P.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (06) : S466 - S466
  • [5] Exploring PM2.5 Environmental Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China
    Ma, Dongdong
    Li, Guifang
    He, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
  • [6] The contribution and influencing factors of different components to oxidation potential in PM2.5 powder samples
    Peng, Qin
    Li, Dan
    Luo, Yu
    Peng, Ze-Zhi
    Sun, Jian
    Tomoaki, Okuda
    Shen, Zhen-Xing
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (04): : 1957 - 1965
  • [7] Analysis of the Spatial Association Network of PM2.5 and Its Influencing Factors in China
    Wang, Huiping
    Ge, Qi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [8] Influencing Factors of PM2.5 Pollution: Disaster Points of Meteorological Factors
    Sun, Ruiling
    Zhou, Yi
    Wu, Jie
    Gong, Zaiwu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (20)
  • [9] Characteristics of Secondary Inorganic Ions in PM2.5 and Its Influencing Factors in Summer in Zhengzhou
    He B.
    Yang J.-R.
    Xu Y.-F.
    Yuan M.-H.
    Zhai S.-T.
    Zhao C.-M.
    Wang S.-B.
    Zhang R.-Q.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (01): : 36 - 47
  • [10] Features of extreme PM2.5 pollution and its influencing factors: evidence from China
    Deng, Lu
    Liu, Xinzhu
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (10)