The effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice: an observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Fernandez-Fernandez, Oscar [1 ]
Garcia-Trujillo, Lucia [1 ]
Guerrero-Fernandez, Miguel [1 ]
Leon, Antonio [1 ]
Lopez-Madrona, Jose C. [1 ]
Alonso, Ana [1 ]
Bustamante, Rafael [1 ]
Fernandez-Sanchez, Victoria E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Inst Neurociencias Clin, Serv Neurol, E-29010 Malaga, Spain
[2] Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Serv Neurofisiol, E-29010 Malaga, Spain
关键词
Effectiveness; Glatiramer acetate; Multiple sclerosis; Progression; Relapse; Safety; Treatment; REMITTING MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE; DISABILITY; MS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice: an observational study Aim. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of glatiramer acetate for use in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods. A retrospective, observational study was conducted on patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with glatiramer acetate in clinical practice. The primary outcome was the clinical effectiveness of glatiramer acetate treatment. Results. The study included a total of 104 patients (women, 59.6%; age at onset of glatiramer acetate treatment, 39.9 +/- 10.9 years; prior treatment for multiple sclerosis, 30.8%). The patients had received glatiramer acetate treatment for an average of 3.6 +/- 1.9 years. During the first year of glatiramer acetate treatment, the relapse rate decreased by 60%. At this time, the number of relapses had decreased for 47 patients (45.1%), 67 patients (68.4%) had not suffered a relapse and 78 patients (75.0%) showed no signs of progression. During the second year of glatiramer acetate treatment, the relapse rate decreased by 70%. At this time, the number of relapses had decreased for 43 patients (41.3%), 63 patients (75.9%) had not suffered a relapse and 59 patients (56.7%) showed no signs of progression. There were no reported relapses or progression in 56 patients (53.8%) and 41 patients (39.4%) during the first and second years of treatment, respectively. Discontinuation of glatiramer acetate was necessary in only three patients.-The most common adverse effects included fatigue (28.9%) and spasticity (7.7%). Conclusion. This evaluation of glatiramer acetate use in clinical practice supports the effectiveness and,the safety profile observed in previously published clinical trial studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice conditions
    Arnal-Garcia, Carmen
    del Campo Amigo-Jorrin, Maria
    Maria Lopez-Real, Ana
    Lema-Devesa, Carme
    Llopis, Noemi
    Sanchez-de la Rosa R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (12) : 2212 - 2218
  • [2] Surfactant effectiveness in clinical practice. Observational study
    Bevilacqua, G
    Parmigiani, S
    PERINATAL MEDICINE OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 751 - 756
  • [3] Head-to-head Comparisons of Interferon Beta and Glatiramer Acetate in Clinical Practice
    Butzkueven, H.
    Kalincik, T.
    Jokubaitis, V
    Izguierdo, G.
    Duquette, P.
    Girard, M.
    Grammond, P.
    Lugaresi, A.
    Oreja-Guevara, C.
    Grand-Maison, F.
    Giuliani, G.
    Hupperts, R.
    Van Pesch, V.
    Bergamaschi, R.
    Boz, C.
    Fernandez-Bolanos, R.
    Iuliano, G.
    Fletscher, S.
    La Spitaleri, D.
    Peterson, T.
    Cristiano, E.
    Rio, M. E.
    Amato, M. P.
    Verheul, F.
    Lechner-Scott, J.
    Cabrera-Gomez, A.
    Fiol, M.
    Saladino, M. L.
    Moore, F.
    Deri, N.
    Barnett, M.
    Vella, N.
    Shaw, C.
    Slee, M.
    Savino, A.
    Trojano, M.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (07) : 927 - 927
  • [4] Clinical significance of glatiramer acetate antibodies
    Blanchette, F.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2007, 13 : S28 - S35
  • [5] Impact of glatiramer acetate on paraclinical markers of neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis: A prospective observational clinical trial
    Ehling, Rainer
    Di Pauli, Franziska
    Lackner, Peter
    Rainer, Carolyn
    Kraus, Viktoria
    Hegen, Harald
    Lutterotti, Andreas
    Kuenz, Bettina
    De Zordo, Tobias
    Schocke, Michael
    Glatzl, Susanne
    Loescher, Wolfgang N.
    Deisenhammer, Florian
    Reindl, Markus
    Berger, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 287 : 98 - 105
  • [6] A longitudinal observational study of a cohort of patients with relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate
    Debouverie, M.
    Moreau, T.
    Lebrun, C.
    Heinzlef, O.
    Brudon, F.
    Msihid, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 (11) : 1266 - 1274
  • [7] Efficacy of glatiramer acetate in Czech multicentre observational study in the period 2006-2010
    Stourac, P.
    Praksova, P.
    Kontrova, I.
    Hladikova, M.
    Benesova, Y.
    Okacova, I.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2011, 17 : S475 - S475
  • [8] Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study
    Derek Weycker
    Robin Doroff
    Ahuva Hanau
    Charles Bowers
    Rajesh Belani
    David Chandler
    Alexander Lonshteyn
    Mark Bensink
    Gary H. Lyman
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [9] Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study
    Weycker, Derek
    Doroff, Robin
    Hanau, Ahuva
    Bowers, Charles
    Belani, Rajesh
    Chandler, David
    Lonshteyn, Alexander
    Bensink, Mark
    Lyman, Gary H.
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Clinical data associated with response to glatiramer acetate
    Casanova-Peno, I.
    Alvarez-Lafuente, R.
    De Las Heras-Revilla, V.
    Bartolome-Puras, M.
    Valencia-Sanchez, C.
    Orviz-Garcia, A.
    Arroyo-Gonzalez, R.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (11) : 465 - 466