Work Breaks during Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: Patient Benefits and Surgeon's Perceptions

被引:16
|
作者
Engelmann, Carsten [1 ]
Schneider, Mischa [1 ]
Grote, Gudela [2 ]
Kirschbaum, Clemens [3 ]
Dingemann, Jens [1 ]
Osthaus, Alexander [4 ]
Ure, Benno [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Pediat Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] ETH, Dept Work & Org Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Biopsychol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[4] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
intraoperative breaks; physiology; effects of pneumoperitoneum; laparoscopy; SHARED MENTAL MODELS; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; TEAMWORK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1322542
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction We recently reported that 5-minute work breaks every 25 minutes during long lasting laparoscopy in children (intermittent pneumoperitoneum [IPP] scheme) decrease the surgeon's stress markers such as saliva cortisol and heart rate and improve time-concentration scores significantly. Data on the impact of breaks on the patient and on the surgeon's perception of breaks, however, are still lacking. Materials and Methods We present the comprehensive biometry data of a randomized trial including 26 patients operated with (IPP) and 26 patients without breaks (continuous pneumoperitoneum [CPP]). Moreover, we analyzed the surgeon's perception of the break scheme using behaviorally anchored 10-point rating scales. Results There were no significant intergroup differences in the pooled patients' hemodynamics including cardiac output, blood gas readings, and temperature during and after the operation. Infants <1 year of age undergoing IPP versus CPP produced significantly higher urine volumes (1.60 +/- 1.8 vs. 0.67 +/- 1.00 mL/h/m(2), p < 0.05). The overall area under the curve (AUC) of their cardiac output was 106.7 +/- 41.1 (IPP) versus 78.0 +/- 41.3 (CPP). This difference became significant during long operations (p < 0.05 for AUC 150 to 270 minutes). Surgeon's break perception and acceptance: team communication shifted from an implicit "mute communication" to an explicit way "issues are outspoken" by +4.7 +/- 2.6 (p < 0.05) with improved coherence between operator and assistants (+3.9 +/- 2.1). However, when questioned whether there was one particular welcome (5.1 +/- 1) or extremely disturbing (6.4 +/- 2.4) break during the entire procedure, the latter yielded a higher score (p > 0.05). Acceptance varied according to the surgeon's own esteem of his/her work style. Operators with high self-ratings for "fast" were inclined to put up with shorter breaks ("fast" vs. "slow" = 3.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.05). Overall the scheme was approved (5.9 +/- 3.2). Conclusions A break scheme has no detrimental effect on patient physiology and is beneficial in infants. It needs careful tailoring to both the surgeon's work situation and self-esteem to gain acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 444
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive surgery: the surgeon's interface
    McCloy, RF
    Stone, R
    [J]. VISIONS OF TOMORROW - IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 1997 (03): : 171 - 178
  • [2] Ergonomic surgeon's chair for use during minimally invasive surgery
    Schurr, MO
    Buess, GF
    Wieth, F
    Saile, HJ
    Botsch, M
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 1999, 9 (04): : 244 - 247
  • [3] Radiation exposure of patient and surgeon in minimally invasive kidney stone surgery
    Demirci, A.
    Karabacak, O. Raif
    Yalcinkaya, F.
    Yigitbasi, O.
    Aktas, C.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2016, 26 (06): : 353 - 359
  • [4] Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Duhancioglu, Gabriel
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Manning, Blaine T.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (03): : E184 - E192
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Single Surgeon's Experience
    Doinn, O. T.
    McCarthy, J.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 : S53 - S53
  • [6] The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Asiri, Al Hassan
    de Gara, Christopher J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (05): : 589 - 591
  • [7] Minimally invasive surgery in children
    Schier, F
    [J]. CHIRURG, 1996, 67 (06): : 593 - 603
  • [8] The vascular surgeon and minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine
    Vaquero-Morillo, F.
    Ballesteros-Pomar, M.
    Fernandez-Moran, C.
    Saavedra, A. Mostaza
    [J]. ANGIOLOGIA, 2011, 63 (02): : 59 - 64
  • [9] Didactic Benefits of Surgery on Body Donors during Live Surgery Events in Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Ackermann, Johannes
    Wedel, Thilo
    Holthaus, Bernd
    Bojahr, Bernd
    Hackethal, Andreas
    Brucker, Sara
    Biebl, Matthias
    Westermann, Martina
    Guenther, Veronika
    Krueger, Magret
    Maass, Nicolai
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Peters, Goentje
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (09) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Patient Care During Minimally Invasive Lateral Spine Surgery
    Dufault, Caroline A.
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2018, 108 (02) : 127 - 139