Evaluation of the Therapeutic Community Treatment Model in Thailand: Policy Implications for Compulsory and Prison-Based Treatment

被引:11
|
作者
Johnson, Knowlton W. [1 ]
Young, Linda [1 ]
Shamblen, Stephen [1 ]
Suresh, Geetha [2 ]
Browne, Thom [3 ]
Chookhare, Khun Warunee [4 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Inst Res & Evaluat Inc, Louisville Ctr, Louisville, KY 40208 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Justice Adm, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Bur Int Narcot & Law Enforcement Affairs, Off Anticrime Programs, US Dept State, Washington, DC USA
[4] CSN & Associates Co Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
drug user treatment; international research; outcome evaluation; research-based policy; therapeutic community; treatment satisfaction; quality of life; coerced treatment; DRUG-ABUSE; FOLLOW-UP; TREATMENT RETENTION; PROGRAM FIDELITY; SUBSTANCE USE; TIME SPENT; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; METHAMPHETAMINE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.3109/10826084.2012.663279
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
This study, conducted in 2005 to 2007, presents results that are based on a proscriptive cohort design. The sample consisted of 769 residents in 22 drug user treatment programs who stayed in treatment for at least 30 days to one year; 510 former residents (66%) from 21 programs (95%) were interviewed again at a 6-month post-treatment follow-up assessment. A majority of the participants were male, lived with family or relatives, had completed only primary school, and had a fulltime or a part-time job prior to entering treatment. The participating therapeutic community (TC) programs were a mixture of volunteer, compulsory-probation, and prison-based programs. In-person interview data and urine testing showed that the self-reported drug use prevalence rates are reliable. The results show large positive treatment effects on 30-day and 6-month illegal drug use and small to medium effects on the severity of alcohol use and related problems. A multilevel regression analysis suggests that residents' reduced stigma, adaptation of the TC model, and frequency of alcohol and drug use-related consequences partially predict treatment success. Study limitations and policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 909
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multisite evaluation of prison-based therapeutic community drug treatment
    Welsh, Wayne N.
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 34 (11) : 1481 - 1498
  • [2] Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community
    De Leon, G
    Melnick, G
    Thomas, G
    Kressel, D
    Wexler, HK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2000, 26 (01): : 33 - 46
  • [3] Sanctions and rewards in prison-based therapeutic community treatment
    Burdon, WM
    Prendergast, ML
    Eisen, V
    Messina, NP
    FEDERAL PROBATION, 2003, 67 (02) : 47 - 52
  • [4] A census of prison-based drug treatment programs: Implications for programming, policy, and evaluation
    Welsh, WN
    Zajac, G
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2004, 50 (01) : 108 - 133
  • [5] EVALUATION RESEARCH ON PRISON-BASED DRUG-TREATMENT PROGRAMS AND SOME POLICY IMPLICATIONS
    ROUSE, JJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1991, 26 (01): : 29 - 44
  • [6] Client perceptions of prison-based therapeutic community drug treatment programs
    Melnick, G
    Hawke, J
    Wexler, HK
    PRISON JOURNAL, 2004, 84 (01): : 121 - 138
  • [7] Testing an Interactionist Theory of Treatment Engagement in a Pennsylvania Prison-Based Therapeutic Community
    Davidson, Kimberly M.
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 47 (10) : 1282 - 1298
  • [8] Treatment engagement in a prison-based Therapeutic Community: A mixed-methods approach
    Davidson, Kimberly M.
    Young, Jacob T. N.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2019, 103 : 33 - 42
  • [9] Evaluation of the effectiveness of a prison-based drug treatment
    Jose Casares-Lopez, Maria
    Gonzalez-Menendez, Ana M.
    Paula Fernandez-Garcia, M.
    Villagra, Patricia
    PSICOTHEMA, 2012, 24 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [10] Predictors of therapeutic engagement in prison-based drug treatment
    Welsh, Wayne N.
    McGrain, Patrick N.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 96 (03) : 271 - 280